Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ref #183 and almarklein/scenex#2
I think it's worth reviewing the current close mechanics and see if they can be better aligned accross backends. E.g. the extra processing events in glfw when the last window is closed feels hacky, and wx does weird stuff too. Maybe the loop task should simply run 0.1s after the last window is closed. And maybe a backend that detects getting closed should notify the loop or something. Also, let's add tests for loads of cases. E.g. running and closing a wx window, programatically vs via button, also when running on an outside loop, etc.