Skip to content

Conversation

mayeut
Copy link
Member

@mayeut mayeut commented Nov 24, 2024

mitigates #921

The docs and the checks are still inconsistent (setuptools>=61 & setuptools>=64 are used depending on checks or doc).
This aligns the runtime dependency with the check.

@mayeut
Copy link
Member Author

mayeut commented Nov 24, 2024

re-reading #921, the doc says:

Note: `setuptools-scm>=8` intentionally doesn't depend on setuptools to ease non-setuptools usage.
Please ensure a recent version of setuptools (>=64) is installed.

If the intent of leaving a lower bound blank was for this, then this PR should probably be closed while waiting for one that actually removes the dependency and/or update the check to only run when called from setuptools entrypoints ?

@RonnyPfannschmidt RonnyPfannschmidt merged commit 1ddd483 into pypa:main Jan 14, 2025
18 checks passed
@RonnyPfannschmidt
Copy link
Contributor

a new package name will bbe used for non setuptools dependency in future as it tuns out build env configuration is fragile enough already without setuptools_scm adding a extra dimension of error

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants