Skip to content

[pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate #1182

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 13, 2025
Merged

Conversation

updates:
- [github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit-hooks: v5.0.0 → v6.0.0](pre-commit/pre-commit-hooks@v5.0.0...v6.0.0)
- [github.com/astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit: v0.12.7 → v0.12.8](astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit@v0.12.7...v0.12.8)
- [github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit-hooks: v5.0.0 → v6.0.0](pre-commit/pre-commit-hooks@v5.0.0...v6.0.0)
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.88%. Comparing base (2c75c45) to head (bbf5a2c).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1182   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.88%   88.88%           
=======================================
  Files           2        2           
  Lines         405      405           
  Branches       44       44           
=======================================
  Hits          360      360           
  Misses         35       35           
  Partials       10       10           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Pierre-Sassoulas
Copy link
Member

I grouped some hooks together while upgrading, but it could be voluntary for a better hooks order. I can revert if that's the case.

@seifertm
Copy link
Contributor

I grouped some hooks together while upgrading, but it could be voluntary for a better hooks order. I can revert if that's the case.

No need to revert, I appreciate you taking care of the upgrade!

@seifertm seifertm added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 13, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 4fbe1e0 Aug 13, 2025
22 checks passed
@seifertm seifertm deleted the pre-commit-ci-update-config branch August 13, 2025 05:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants