Skip to content

chore(lazer): correct order of guides #760

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 22, 2025
Merged

chore(lazer): correct order of guides #760

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 22, 2025

Conversation

nidhi-singh02
Copy link
Contributor

@nidhi-singh02 nidhi-singh02 commented Jul 22, 2025

Description

The order is not correct

Screenshot 2025-07-21 at 5 34 03 PM

Type of Change

  • New Page
  • Page update/improvement
  • Fix typo/grammar
  • Restructure/reorganize content
  • Update links/references
  • Other (please describe):

Areas Affected

Checklist

  • I ran pre-commit run --all-files to check for linting errors
  • I have reviewed my changes for clarity and accuracy
  • All links are valid and working
  • Images (if any) are properly formatted and include alt text
  • Code examples (if any) are complete and functional
  • Content follows the established style guide
  • Changes are properly formatted in Markdown
  • Preview renders correctly in development environment

Related Issues

Closes #

Additional Notes

Contributor Information

  • Name:
  • Email:

Screenshots

image

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 22, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jul 22, 2025 9:03am
documentation ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jul 22, 2025 9:03am

@aditya520 aditya520 merged commit 2e67d11 into main Jul 22, 2025
5 checks passed
@aditya520 aditya520 deleted the lazer-consumer-order branch July 22, 2025 13:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants