Skip to content

Conversation

ali-behjati
Copy link
Collaborator

@ali-behjati ali-behjati commented Nov 12, 2024

Also changes Metals to Metal to match the asset type correctly.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 12, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
api-reference ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 13, 2024 0:23am
proposals ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 13, 2024 0:23am
staking ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 13, 2024 0:23am
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
component-library ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Nov 13, 2024 0:23am
insights ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Nov 13, 2024 0:23am

Comment on lines 339 to +350
impl Display for AssetType {
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut Formatter) -> FmtResult {
write!(f, "{:?}", self)
match self {
AssetType::Crypto => write!(f, "crypto"),
AssetType::FX => write!(f, "fx"),
AssetType::Equity => write!(f, "equity"),
AssetType::Metal => write!(f, "metal"),
AssetType::Rates => write!(f, "rates"),
AssetType::CryptoRedemptionRate => write!(f, "crypto_redemption_rate"),
}
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe implement it using serde? It's an extra allocation but that shouldn't matter too much.

impl Display for AssetType {
    fn fmt(&self, f: &mut Formatter) -> FmtResult {
        let value = serde_json::to_value(self).unwrap();
        write!(f, "{}", value.as_str().unwrap())
    }
}

(You can also use serde_value instead of serde_json).

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ali-behjati ali-behjati Nov 13, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah that works but i wanted to be explicit here. and being explicit here actually helped me capture a bug :D (in snake_case FX becomes f_x). I could possibly have explicit tests though but the benefit here is that if i add a new field i won't miss adding this explicit definition.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants