Skip to content

Conversation

@tejasbadadare
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 3, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
api-reference ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 3, 2025 9:06pm
proposals ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 3, 2025 9:06pm
staking ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 3, 2025 9:06pm
3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
component-library ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 3, 2025 9:06pm
entropy-debugger ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 3, 2025 9:06pm
insights ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 3, 2025 9:06pm

Copy link
Contributor

@darunrs darunrs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Strange that it was deploying solana before when its called rust sdk. Do we need to add another publish workflow for solana still? Any way we can test that this works?

@tejasbadadare
Copy link
Contributor Author

Strange that it was deploying solana before when its called rust sdk. Do we need to add another publish workflow for solana still? Any way we can test that this works?

There looks to be a new one publish-rust-lazer-contract.yml that deploys the solana contract

@tejasbadadare tejasbadadare merged commit da2436a into main Feb 4, 2025
8 checks passed
@tejasbadadare tejasbadadare deleted the tb/lazer/add-publish-workflow-for-rust-client branch February 4, 2025 18:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants