Skip to content

Conversation

ali-behjati
Copy link
Contributor

This change only contains the contract. I'll add the client later if needed. Please ignore the first mechanical commit.

@ali-behjati ali-behjati requested a review from Riateche April 23, 2025 14:37
Copy link
Contributor

@Riateche Riateche left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks nice! Would it be possible to add a test for the update instruction and add it to CI?

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
1.75.0

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are we stuck on these older versions for some reason?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, this is the version corresponding to the Solana SDK corresponding to the Anchor version.

@ali-behjati ali-behjati force-pushed the lazer/anchor/add-contract branch 2 times, most recently from b6a8df6 to ab783a4 Compare April 25, 2025 09:34
@ali-behjati ali-behjati force-pushed the lazer/anchor/add-contract branch from ab783a4 to b9f0c00 Compare April 25, 2025 10:43
@ali-behjati ali-behjati force-pushed the lazer/anchor/add-contract branch 2 times, most recently from e78298b to e991033 Compare April 25, 2025 17:27
@ali-behjati ali-behjati force-pushed the lazer/anchor/add-contract branch from e991033 to 4e042da Compare April 25, 2025 17:28
Copy link
Contributor

@Riateche Riateche left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

@ali-behjati ali-behjati merged commit 9ac35e4 into main Apr 29, 2025
5 checks passed
@ali-behjati ali-behjati deleted the lazer/anchor/add-contract branch April 29, 2025 12:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants