Skip to content

Conversation

tleonhardt
Copy link
Member

@tleonhardt tleonhardt commented May 26, 2025

This PR does a few things in pursuit of fixing our integrated code coverage analysis provided by Codecov:

  1. It removes the last usage of invoke from our GitHub Actions CI scripts. Now we rely purely on uv for everything.
  2. Uploading of data to Codecov is now done using a private token which is stored in GitHub secrets for this repo.
  3. Both test data and code coverage are now uploaded.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 26, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.15%. Comparing base (ff46021) to head (fad24b5).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1434      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.72%   98.15%   +0.42%     
==========================================
  Files          22       41      +19     
  Lines        5753    13744    +7991     
==========================================
+ Hits         5622    13490    +7868     
- Misses        131      254     +123     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 98.15% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tleonhardt tleonhardt changed the title Attempt at fixing Codecov coverage analysis Fix Codecov code coverage analysis from test data May 26, 2025
@tleonhardt tleonhardt merged commit dcda271 into master May 26, 2025
30 checks passed
@tleonhardt tleonhardt deleted the codecov branch May 26, 2025 17:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant