-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
fix: Avoid frequent writes to graph.json
in a loop
#738
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
MichaelYochpaz
wants to merge
2
commits into
python-wheel-build:main
Choose a base branch
from
MichaelYochpaz:fix-frequent-graph-writes
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -34,3 +34,6 @@ __pycache__/ | |
|
||
/.mypy_cache/ | ||
.skip-coverage | ||
|
||
.vscode/ | ||
.idea/ |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about you write the graph file every time Fromager processes a top level requirement? A typical product has between one and a handful of top level requirement.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the code you made will still write the file for all dependencies, as to my understanding, we call
bootstrap
on every dependency recursively, so this loop runs for every dependency down the tree and not just the top level requirements. (this loop you quoted is part of thebootstrap
function, and we callbootstrap
on every requirement).About the idea itself - it's possible to only write after each top level dependency is completed, and will likely still be a big performance boost (slightly lesser since we still do more writes, but it's marginal), but what benefit does this approach have over the approach of writing once at the end, inside a
finally
block (which means we'll write the file even if there's an error)? I don't see any benefits to it.