Skip to content

Conversation

@skirpichev
Copy link
Contributor

@skirpichev skirpichev commented Jul 25, 2024

Docs says: "Note that ternary pow() will not try calling __rpow__() (the coercion rules would become too complicated)."

Probably, this is not something, that might be changed (see recent discussion in https://discuss.python.org/t/35185). Lets simplify signature of this dunder method.


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--122260.org.readthedocs.build/

Docs says: "Note that ternary pow() will not try calling __rpow__() (the
coercion rules would become too complicated)."

Probably, this is not something, that might be changed (see recent
discussion in https://discuss.python.org/t/35185).  Lets simplify
signature of this dunder method.
@skirpichev
Copy link
Contributor Author

closed, per #130251

@skirpichev skirpichev closed this Feb 19, 2025
@skirpichev skirpichev deleted the fix-rpow-signature-122193 branch February 19, 2025 00:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

awaiting review docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news

Projects

Status: Todo

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant