gh-131677: Fix flaky test_lru_cache_threaded3 #131679
Conversation
The call to `with self.subTest(...)` was not thread-safe.
rhettinger
requested review from
serhiy-storchaka
and removed request for
rhettinger
|
@serhiy-storchaka This is your code. Do you want to take a look? @colesbury Can |
I think practically you'd have to get rid of |
|
As you fix these, perhaps keep a list of tools that are intrinsically single-threaded. Such as list might be useful for linters and it might make a good FAQ entry. |
|
Thanks @colesbury for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.13. |
The call to `with self.subTest(...)` was not thread-safe. (cherry picked from commit a123245) Co-authored-by: Sam Gross <[email protected]>
|
GH-131692 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.13 branch. |
|
Thanks @colesbury for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.12. |
The call to `with self.subTest(...)` was not thread-safe. (cherry picked from commit a123245) Co-authored-by: Sam Gross <[email protected]>
|
GH-131693 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.12 branch. |
…131693) The call to `with self.subTest(...)` was not thread-safe. (cherry picked from commit a123245) Co-authored-by: Sam Gross <[email protected]>
…131692) The call to `with self.subTest(...)` was not thread-safe. (cherry picked from commit a123245) Co-authored-by: Sam Gross <[email protected]>
The call to `with self.subTest(...)` was not thread-safe.
The call to `with self.subTest(...)` was not thread-safe.
4 participants
The call to
with self.subTest(...)was not thread-safe.test_lru_cache_threaded3#131677