-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33.1k
gh-83371: handle exceptions from callbacks in process pools #131813
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
duaneg
wants to merge
11
commits into
python:main
Choose a base branch
from
duaneg:gh-83371
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c7b3d39
gh-83371: handle exceptions from user-supplied callbacks in process p…
duaneg 3582925
Use threading.excepthook instead of sys.excepthook
duaneg 6526fa3
Raise new group exceptions on callback failure instead of just proces…
duaneg e22ce74
Correct silly mistake
duaneg 89b8c56
Move timing dependent test (of multiple callback failures) into separate
duaneg eda0acd
CI tests on free-threading builds are failing due to leaked barrier r…
duaneg 7125fc8
Shared objects are being leaked via what *looks like* a reference cyc…
duaneg b7f18ed
Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/python/cpython into gh-83371
duaneg 51a8310
Revert all commits after "Use threading.excepthook instead of sys.exc…
duaneg 4c4674b
Add a test and a blurb
duaneg e321047
Correct reference in blurb
duaneg File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe threading.excepthook would be better to call?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, quite possibly. In fact I did use that in an earlier version of the code. I decided to change because the thread is internal to the pool code, which does not set its
excepthook
. So ISTM it will always end up using the system hook anyway, and the code is a little uglier because it needs to marshal the args then explicitlydel
them to avoid reference cycles:However, it probably is more robust/future-proof/correct to use
threading.excepthook
, so I'm happy to switch to this if you think it is appropriate.