-
-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 33.3k
gh-127833: lexical analysis: Add backticks to BOM example #132407
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
|
Thanks @StanFromIreland for the PR, and @AA-Turner for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.13, 3.14. |
…onGH-132407) (cherry picked from commit 0552ce0) Co-authored-by: Stan Ulbrych <[email protected]>
…onGH-132407) (cherry picked from commit 0552ce0) Co-authored-by: Stan Ulbrych <[email protected]>
|
GH-133632 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.14 branch. |
|
GH-133633 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.13 branch. |
Issue is used for other lexical analysis changes (links and expanding section)
logging-cookbook already does this:
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--132407.org.readthedocs.build/