Skip to content

Conversation

@ambv
Copy link
Contributor

@ambv ambv commented Jun 2, 2025

Addresses CVEs 2024-12718, 2025-4138, 2025-4330, and 2025-4517.

[edit @encukou]: Also addresses CVE-2025-4435. Sorry for leaving that out of the commit messages.

Co-authored-by: Petr Viktorin [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Langa [email protected]


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--135037.org.readthedocs.build/

…path(strict='allow_missing')`

Addresses CVEs 2024-12718, 2025-4138, 2025-4330, and 2025-4517.

Co-authored-by: Petr Viktorin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Langa <[email protected]>
@serhiy-storchaka
Copy link
Member

See also #71189.

@encukou
Copy link
Member

encukou commented Jun 2, 2025

See also #71189.

To align with this, there'd be a ntpath.ALLOW_MISSING singleton rather than an 'allow_missing' string.
That's possible, of course. It can catch typos. But I don't think it's worth having to import an extra name.

@encukou encukou added the 🔨 test-with-buildbots Test PR w/ buildbots; report in status section label Jun 2, 2025
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @encukou for commit 5af66c6 🤖

Results will be shown at:

https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/grid?branch=refs%2Fpull%2F135037%2Fmerge

If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the 🔨 test-with-buildbots label again.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the 🔨 test-with-buildbots Test PR w/ buildbots; report in status section label Jun 2, 2025
@encukou encukou added the 🔨 test-with-buildbots Test PR w/ buildbots; report in status section label Jun 3, 2025
This was referenced Oct 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants