-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33.6k
gh-136057: Allow step and next to step over for loops #136160
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
gaogaotiantian
merged 10 commits into
python:main
from
gaogaotiantian:pdb-next-for-loop
Nov 16, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
24857e4
Allow step and next to step over for loops
gaogaotiantian 83cd3b3
📜🤖 Added by blurb_it.
blurb-it[bot] e47731e
Update 2025-07-01-04-57-57.gh-issue-136057.4-t596.rst
gaogaotiantian 99837fd
Deal with enterframe == None in set_step
gaogaotiantian 6ad8598
Rename the variable and update the comments
gaogaotiantian 21d2783
Fix lint
gaogaotiantian 4094efc
Apply suggestions from code review
gaogaotiantian 1d3f1b3
Initialize new attributes
gaogaotiantian d7ad5d4
Merge branch 'main' into pdb-next-for-loop
gaogaotiantian 553f715
Merge branch 'main' into pdb-next-for-loop
gaogaotiantian File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions
1
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2025-07-01-04-57-57.gh-issue-136057.4-t596.rst
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
| Fixed the bug in :mod:`pdb` and :mod:`bdb` where ``next`` and ``step`` can't go over the line if a loop exists in the line. |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't it be that next steps over the list comp but step executes every iteration?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not according to our documentation
I mean we can have different interpretation of the phrase "first possible occasion". Technically we can do this at bytecode level - but that's probably not we really want. I think we should stick to the explanation in the parenthesis.