Skip to content

Conversation

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Jul 14, 2025

Previously, we assumed that instrumentation would happen for all copies of
the bytecode if the instrumentation version on the code object didn't match
the per-interpreter instrumentation version. That assumption was incorrect:
instrumentation will exit early if there are no new "events," even if there
is an instrumentation version mismatch.

To fix this, include the instrumented opcodes when creating new copies of
the bytecode, rather than replacing them with their uninstrumented variants.
I don't think we have to worry about races between instrumentation and creating
new copies of the bytecode: instrumentation and new bytecode creation cannot happen
concurrently. Instrumentation requires that either the world is stopped or the
code object's per-object lock is held and new bytecode creation requires holding
the code object's per-object lock.
(cherry picked from commit d995922)

Co-authored-by: mpage [email protected]

…the bytecode (pythonGH-136525)

Previously, we assumed that instrumentation would happen for all copies of
the bytecode if the instrumentation version on the code object didn't match
the per-interpreter instrumentation version. That assumption was incorrect:
instrumentation will exit early if there are no new "events," even if there
is an instrumentation version mismatch.

To fix this, include the instrumented opcodes when creating new copies of
the bytecode, rather than replacing them with their uninstrumented variants.
I don't think we have to worry about races between instrumentation and creating
new copies of the bytecode: instrumentation and new bytecode creation cannot happen
concurrently. Instrumentation requires that either the world is stopped or the
code object's per-object lock is held and new bytecode creation requires holding
the code object's per-object lock.
(cherry picked from commit d995922)

Co-authored-by: mpage <[email protected]>
@colesbury colesbury merged commit 9ae74e9 into python:3.14 Jul 15, 2025
45 checks passed
kumaraditya303 added a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2025
…ies of the bytecode (pythonGH-136525) (pythonGH-136657)

Previously, we assumed that instrumentation would happen for all copies of
the bytecode if the instrumentation version on the code object didn't match
the per-interpreter instrumentation version. That assumption was incorrect:
instrumentation will exit early if there are no new "events," even if there
is an instrumentation version mismatch.

To fix this, include the instrumented opcodes when creating new copies of
the bytecode, rather than replacing them with their uninstrumented variants.
I don't think we have to worry about races between instrumentation and creating
new copies of the bytecode: instrumentation and new bytecode creation cannot happen
concurrently. Instrumentation requires that either the world is stopped or the
code object's per-object lock is held and new bytecode creation requires holding
the code object's per-object lock.
(cherry picked from commit d995922)

Co-authored-by: mpage <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Kumar Aditya <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants