-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33.1k
Docs: add dunder and walrus to the glossary #137430
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
with :term:`abstract base classes <abstract base class>`.) Instead, it | ||
typically employs :func:`hasattr` tests or :term:`EAFP` programming. | ||
|
||
dunder |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Worth also adding sunder?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That is far far less used, i'm not sure it rises to the level of common use.
Thanks @nedbat for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.13, 3.14. |
(cherry picked from commit 44ff6b5) Co-authored-by: Ned Batchelder <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 44ff6b5) Co-authored-by: Ned Batchelder <[email protected]>
GH-137434 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.14 branch. |
GH-137435 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.13 branch. |
Co-authored-by: Ned Batchelder <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ned Batchelder <[email protected]>
…ython#137434) Co-authored-by: Ned Batchelder <[email protected]>
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--137430.org.readthedocs.build/