-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33.3k
gh-60107: avoid io.RawIOBase.read from reading into a temporary bytearray
#138616
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
taskevich
wants to merge
9
commits into
python:main
Choose a base branch
from
taskevich:direct-read-bytes
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
974cc01
allocate a bytes object directly instead and manually construct a wri…
taskevich b44bec9
📜🤖 Added by blurb_it.
blurb-it[bot] 897e813
gh-60107: gh-138616: Minor code changes
taskevich 77e3875
Merge branch 'direct-read-bytes' of https://github.com/taskevich/cpyt…
taskevich 2351f34
gh-60107: Change blurb_it
taskevich c671122
Update Misc/NEWS.d/next/C_API/2025-09-07-10-52-09.gh-issue-60107.dhcb…
taskevich 5396b1c
📜🤖 Added by blurb_it.
blurb-it[bot] 23cd0ff
Deleted incorrect news from C_API
taskevich 905b3ec
gh-60107: Tests for readinto
taskevich File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions
2
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2025-09-07-11-30-53.gh-issue-60107.TFrtr-.rst
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ | ||
| Avoid :meth:`io.RawIOBase.read` from reading into a temporary :class:`bytearray` | ||
| when calling its own :meth:`io.RawIOBase.readinto` internally. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe I wasn't precise enough.
RawIOBase.read()is implemented in terms ofreadinto. So, what we want to do is provide areadintomethod that does something bad as it's given the internal buffer we constructed in C. I don't know if it's possible to cause a segfault on main with that approach though.Stated otherwise, we want some class:
And then