-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33.2k
gh-76007: Deprecate __version__
attribute in decimal
#140302
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <[email protected]>
(Please edit the commit message when merging so that we’re not tagged forever by pushes in clones! thanks 🙂) |
Co-authored-by: Sergey B Kirpichev <[email protected]>
Éric, all of my commits up to that point had the commit message "Commit"? I tagged you in the PR description, I don't think that should be a burden for longer than this PR is open? There is an "unsubscribe" button in the right sidebar. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, modulo one nitpick about decimal.rst.
I'm not sure also about naming for the constant. But lets see what other people think.
Doc/library/decimal.rst
Outdated
|
||
.. versionadded:: 3.8.3 | ||
|
||
.. data:: SPEC_VERSION |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, I think that this should be moved up before "The constants in this section are only relevant for the C module." sentence of the first paragraph. Which should be also rephrased, i.e. "Following constants in <...>". Clearly, spec version is relevant for both modules.
BTW, I'm not sure about naming. Maybe more verbose "DECIMAL_SPEC_VERSION"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
BTW, I'm not sure about naming. Maybe more verbose "DECIMAL_SPEC_VERSION"?
I have a similar sentiment, I simply used this since it was in the discussion.
It seems core devs sometimes use PR descriptions for commit messages. So, it's rather a reminder for one, who will merge this pr. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure also about naming for the constant. But lets see what other people think.
decimal.SPEC_VERSION
is fine by me. Skip also suggested it at #76007 (comment).
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <[email protected]>
Per discussion in the issue, provide a
SPEC_VERSION
constant instead. CC @merwok @smontanaro📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--140302.org.readthedocs.build/