Skip to content

Conversation

@rumpelsepp
Copy link
Contributor

@rumpelsepp rumpelsepp commented Dec 16, 2020

This adds constants to the socket module which are provided by the new isotp module available in Linux >= 5.10.

https://bugs.python.org/issue42653
#86819

@the-knights-who-say-ni
Copy link

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept this contribution by verifying everyone involved has signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Recognized GitHub username

We couldn't find a bugs.python.org (b.p.o) account corresponding to the following GitHub usernames:

@rumpelsepp

This might be simply due to a missing "GitHub Name" entry in one's b.p.o account settings. This is necessary for legal reasons before we can look at this contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received.

Thanks again for the contribution, we look forward to reviewing it!

@shawnl
Copy link

shawnl commented Dec 16, 2020

As the reporter or the original feature request this patch looks good to me.

(Although I hate autoconf magic)

@rumpelsepp
Copy link
Contributor Author

(Although I hate autoconf magic)

As do I… Is there anything else I have to adjust here? My autoreconf version seems different and it mutilates the checked in configure script.

@vstinner
Copy link
Member

Please open a new issue: https://bugs.python.org/issue10141 is closed.

@rumpelsepp rumpelsepp changed the title bpo-10141: Add constants for isotp.h which is included in Linux >= 5.10 issue42653: Add constants for isotp.h which is included in Linux >= 5.10 Dec 16, 2020
@rumpelsepp rumpelsepp changed the title issue42653: Add constants for isotp.h which is included in Linux >= 5.10 bpo-42653: Add constants for isotp.h which is included in Linux >= 5.10 Dec 16, 2020
@rumpelsepp
Copy link
Contributor Author

done

tiran
tiran previously requested changes Dec 16, 2020
Copy link
Member

@tiran tiran left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please include a blurb and leave the CAN_ISOTP macro in place.

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

And if you don't make the requested changes, you will be poked with soft cushions!

@rumpelsepp
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have made the requested changes; please review again

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

Thanks for making the requested changes!

@tiran: please review the changes made to this pull request.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot requested a review from tiran December 16, 2020 09:30
@github-actions
Copy link

This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale Stale PR or inactive for long period of time. label Jan 16, 2021
@tiran tiran removed their request for review April 17, 2021 21:16
@rumpelsepp
Copy link
Contributor Author

Am I supposed to do any more changes here?

@erlend-aasland erlend-aasland dismissed tiran’s stale review October 14, 2024 22:12

Christian's concerns were addressed: a NEWS blurb was added, and the CAN_ISOTP macro was left in place.

@erlend-aasland erlend-aasland added the 🔨 test-with-buildbots Test PR w/ buildbots; report in status section label Oct 14, 2024
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @erlend-aasland for commit ffae37c 🤖

If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the 🔨 test-with-buildbots label again.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the 🔨 test-with-buildbots Test PR w/ buildbots; report in status section label Oct 14, 2024
@picnixz
Copy link
Member

picnixz commented Aug 22, 2025

Could you move the what's new entry to 3.15.rst instead?

@picnixz
Copy link
Member

picnixz commented Aug 22, 2025

Don't forget to re-add the NEWS entry (I don't know where it disppeared)

@rumpelsepp
Copy link
Contributor Author

Your comments should be addressed now.

@rumpelsepp rumpelsepp force-pushed the isotp branch 3 times, most recently from 3508d7e to 7fb109b Compare August 22, 2025 10:02
@rumpelsepp
Copy link
Contributor Author

@picnixz Thank you for your review. I think I have catched up with your remarks.

@erlend-aasland erlend-aasland enabled auto-merge (squash) September 17, 2025 16:54
@erlend-aasland erlend-aasland linked an issue Sep 17, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@erlend-aasland erlend-aasland merged commit a9b6b09 into python:main Sep 17, 2025
45 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Expose ISO-TP Contants for Linux >= 5.10

10 participants