-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 890
Extend style guide "Use simple language" section #1624
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -103,11 +103,16 @@ Unix | |
Use simple language | ||
=================== | ||
|
||
Avoid esoteric phrasing where possible. Our audience is world-wide and may not | ||
be native English speakers. | ||
|
||
Don't use Latin abbreviations like "e.g." or "i.e." where English words will do, | ||
such as "for example" or "that is." | ||
The documentation has a world-wide audience of varying English proficiency. | ||
To make the documentation more accessible and inclusive, the following should be | ||
avoided: | ||
|
||
- Esoteric phrasing. | ||
- Abbreviations, such as Latin "e.g." or "i.e.," or symbols, such as the | ||
ampersand ('&'), where English words will do, such as | ||
"for example", "that is" and "and," respectively. | ||
- Idioms, as they are often confusing to non-native speakers and | ||
are difficult to translate. | ||
Comment on lines
+114
to
+115
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I've said elsewhere, but part of the draw of Python is that it has historically been less 'clinical'/corporate/dry than other languages, and silly examples (Monty Python) & idioms in prose are part of that. I think there's a fine balance between avoiding overuse and confusion and a prohibition: I would be sad to see this type of thing go. |
||
|
||
|
||
.. index:: diataxis | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't agree with discouraging '&'. It's relatively common, and helps distinguish items in a list, e.g. "Tom & Jerry and Barbie & Ken have both featured in major animated works".