Skip to content

Extend style guide "Use simple language" section #1624

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
15 changes: 10 additions & 5 deletions documentation/style-guide.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -103,11 +103,16 @@ Unix
Use simple language
===================

Avoid esoteric phrasing where possible. Our audience is world-wide and may not
be native English speakers.

Don't use Latin abbreviations like "e.g." or "i.e." where English words will do,
such as "for example" or "that is."
The documentation has a world-wide audience of varying English proficiency.
To make the documentation more accessible and inclusive, the following should be
avoided:

- Esoteric phrasing.
- Abbreviations, such as Latin "e.g." or "i.e.," or symbols, such as the
ampersand ('&'), where English words will do, such as
"for example", "that is" and "and," respectively.
Comment on lines +111 to +113
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't agree with discouraging '&'. It's relatively common, and helps distinguish items in a list, e.g. "Tom & Jerry and Barbie & Ken have both featured in major animated works".

- Idioms, as they are often confusing to non-native speakers and
are difficult to translate.
Comment on lines +114 to +115
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've said elsewhere, but part of the draw of Python is that it has historically been less 'clinical'/corporate/dry than other languages, and silly examples (Monty Python) & idioms in prose are part of that. I think there's a fine balance between avoiding overuse and confusion and a prohibition: I would be sad to see this type of thing go.



.. index:: diataxis
Expand Down
Loading