Add more to Changing Python

developer-workflow/index.rst

@@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ Development workflow
    :maxdepth: 5
 
    communication-channels
+   lang-changes
    development-cycle
    stdlib
    extension-modules
    c-api
-   lang-changes
    grammar
    porting
    sbom

developer-workflow/lang-changes.rst

@@ -1,37 +1,42 @@
 .. _lang-changes:
 .. _langchanges:
 
-Changing the Python language
-============================
-On occasion people come up with an idea on how to change or improve Python as a
-programming language. This document is meant to explain exactly what changes
-have a reasonable chance of being considered and what the process is to propose
-changes to the language.
+Changing Python
+===============
 
+On occasion people come up with an idea for changing or improving Python.
+This page explains how to explore change proposals and what changes
+have a reasonable chance of being considered.
 
-What qualifies
+
+Considerations
 --------------
-First and foremost, it must be understood that changes to the Python
-programming language are difficult to make. When the language changes,
-**every** Python programmer already in existence and all Python programmers to
+
+First, understand that changes to Python
+are difficult to make. When the language changes,
+**every** Python programmer and all Python programmers to
 come will end up eventually learning about the change you want to propose.
 Books will need updating, code will be changed, and a new way to do things will
-need to be learned. Changes to the Python programming language are never taken
+need to be learned. Changes to Python are never taken
 lightly.
 
-Because of the seriousness that language changes carry, any change must be
-beneficial to a large proportion of Python users. If the change only benefits a
-small percentage of Python developers then the change will not be made. A good
-way to see if your idea would work for a large portion of the Python community
-is to ask in the `Ideas Discourse category`_. You can also
-go through Python's stdlib and find examples of code which would benefit from
-your proposed change (which helps communicate the usefulness of your change to
-others). For further guidance, see :ref:`suggesting-changes`.
+Backward compatibility is a significant concern.  Existing Python code has to
+continue to work.  There are exceptions to this rule, but they are very rare
+and are only allowed when the benefits of the change greatly outweigh the costs
+of breaking existing code.
 
-Your proposed change also needs to be *Pythonic*. While only the Steering
-Council can truly classify something as Pythonic, you can read the
-:pep:`Zen of Python <20>` for guidance.
+Because of the seriousness of changing the language, any change must be
+beneficial to many Python users. If the change only helps a small percentage of
+Python developers then the change will not be made. A good way to see if your
+idea would work for a large portion of the Python community is to discuss it in
+the `Ideas Discourse category <ideas_>`_.  You can also look in Python's standard
+library to find examples of code which would benefit from your proposed change.
 
+.. important::
+   For all of these reasons, most proposed changes to Python are rejected.  This
+   doesn't mean you shouldn't suggest them.  It can be useful to explore
+   alternatives and to get feedback from the community.  Just be aware that
+   getting a change accepted is difficult.  Don't take it personally.
 
 .. index::
    single: PEP process
@@ -41,25 +46,98 @@ Council can truly classify something as Pythonic, you can read the
 Suggesting new features and language changes
 --------------------------------------------
 
-The `Ideas Discourse category`_
-is specifically intended for discussion of new features and language changes.
-Please don't be disappointed if your idea isn't met with universal approval:
-as the :pep:`long list of Withdrawn and Rejected PEPs
-<0#rejected-superseded-and-withdrawn-peps>`
-in the :pep:`PEP Index <0>` attests,
-and as befits a reasonably mature programming language,
-getting significant changes into Python isn't a simple task.
+Proposing a change involves the following steps:
+
+- Describe your idea in detail.
+
+- Engage in discussion about the idea.
+
+- Rarely, the idea will advance to a formal proposal stage.
+
+
+Describe your idea
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+The `Ideas Discourse category <ideas_>`_ is specifically intended for discussion
+of new features and language changes. Make your proposal as a `new topic
+<ideas_>`_ there.
+
+Your proposal needs to be **detailed**. Describe the change you want to make,
+why you want to make it, and what benefits it will bring to Python users. Be
+specific. Show that you have considered the effect of the change on existing
+code.
+
+Some things you should **not** do:
+
+- **Don't** format your idea as a Python Enhancement Proposal (*PEP*).
+  It's good to use the PEP template as a
+  guide for what information to include, but don't try to write a full PEP
+  until the idea has been accepted for further consideration.
+
+- **Don't** create a list of proposed changes. Each idea needs its own
+  discussion.  Proposing a change is significant work. You will need to spend
+  time on each proposal. A tossed-off list will not be taken seriously.
+
+When justifying your idea, these are not good reasons to make a change:
+
+- "Other languages work this way." Languages are different. What works well
+  in one language may not work well in Python, or Python may already have a
+  way to do a similar thing.
+
+- "It would be nice." This is too vague. Be specific about the benefits
+  your change will bring, and consider the costs as well.
+
+Some things you **should** do:
+
+- Research whether your idea has been proposed before. There are many
+  suggestions that have been made and rejected in the past. If your idea has a
+  history, read the discussion to see why it was rejected. Previously rejected
+  ideas are especially unlikely to get accepted. If you can address the
+  concerns raised in the previous discussion, mention that in your proposal.
+
+- Read other ideas to see how they are presented. This will help you flesh out
+  your proposal.
+
+- Read other ideas to understand the kinds of concerns that are raised and
+  objections that must be answered. Your proposal will be stronger if you can
+  address these concerns up front.
+
+
+Engage in discussion
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+Once you post your proposal, people will respond. You need to continue
+the discussion, answer questions, and address objections. This is an important
+part of the process. Other people's perspectives will help explore the full
+impact of the idea and find strengths or weaknesses you may not have
+considered.
+
+You will almost always get at least some push-back.  Don't be disappointed, and don't take it personally.
+As the long list of :pep:`Withdrawn and Rejected PEPs
+<0#rejected-superseded-and-withdrawn-peps>` in the :pep:`PEP Index <0>`
+attests, and as befits a mature programming language, getting significant
+changes into Python isn't a simple task.
+
+Engage in good faith. The goal of the discussion is to find the best balance
+between competing concerns. If your idea has merit, the discussion will help
+refine it and make it stronger. If your idea has flaws, the discussion will
+help identify them so you can address them or move on. Keep the discussion
+productive and focused on the issues, not on personalities.
+
+It's especially useful to get core team members involved in the discussion.
+Sometimes they will differ in opinion, or merely be unconvinced.  When there
+isn't a clear positive sentiment, the `Status Quo Wins a Stalemate`_.
+
+Even if your idea is not accepted, the discussion can help you and others
+understand the design of Python better, and help inform future proposals.
 
-If the idea is reasonable, someone will suggest posting it as a feature
-request on the `issue tracker`_, or, for larger changes,
-writing it up as PEP following the :ref:`lang-changes-pep-process`.
 
-Sometimes core developers will differ in opinion,
-or merely be collectively unconvinced.
-When there isn't an obvious victor, then the `Status Quo Wins a Stalemate`_.
+Formal proposal
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 
-For some examples on language changes that were accepted,
-see `Justifying Python Language Changes`_.
+If the idea gets positive discussion, someone will suggest posting it as a
+feature request on the `issue tracker`_, or, for larger changes, writing it up
+as PEP following the :ref:`lang-changes-pep-process`. Congratulations!
 
 
 .. index:: PEP process
@@ -69,20 +147,18 @@ see `Justifying Python Language Changes`_.
 PEP process
 -----------
 
-Once you are certain you have a language change proposal
-which will appeal to the general Python community,
-you can begin the :abbr:`PEP (Python enhancement proposal)` process
-to officially propose the change.
-See :pep:`1` for information on PEPs and the PEP process,
-and the :pep:`PEP Index <0>` for examples.
+Once you are certain you have a language change proposal which will appeal to
+the general Python community, you can begin the :abbr:`PEP (Python enhancement
+proposal)` process to officially propose the change.  See :pep:`1` for
+information on PEPs and the PEP process, and the :pep:`PEP Index <0>` for
+examples.
 
-If the PEP is accepted, then your proposed language change will be introduced
-in the next release of Python.
-Otherwise, your PEP will be recorded as rejected along with an explanation,
-to inform others who may propose a similar language change in the future.
+If the PEP is accepted, then your language change will be introduced in a
+future release of Python.  Otherwise, your PEP will be recorded as rejected
+along with an explanation, to inform others who may propose a similar language
+change in the future.
 
 
 .. _issue tracker: https://github.com/python/cpython/issues
-.. _Ideas Discourse category: https://discuss.python.org/c/ideas/6
-.. _Status Quo Wins a Stalemate: https://www.curiousefficiency.org/posts/2011/02/status-quo-wins-stalemate.html
-.. _Justifying Python Language Changes: https://www.curiousefficiency.org/posts/2011/02/justifying-python-language-changes.html
+.. _ideas: https://discuss.python.org/c/ideas/6
+.. _Status Quo Wins a Stalemate: https://www.curiousefficiency.org/posts/2011/02/status-quo-wins-stalemate/