Add July 2025 meeting notes

docs/monthly-meeting/2025-07.md

@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+# Documentation Community Team Meeting (July 1, 2025)
+
+## Roll call
+
+(Name / `@GitHubUsername` _[/ Discord, if different]_)
+
+- Adam Turner / `@AA-Turner`
+- Hugo van Kemenade / `@hugovk`
+- irvan.putra
+- kattni
+- Keith / `@KeithTheEE`
+- Lutfi Zuchri
+- maciek
+- mattwang44
+- Ryan Duve / `@ryan-duve`
+
+## Introductions
+
+> If there are any new people, we should do a round of introductions.
+
+Several new attendees were present, a round of introductions were made.
+
+## Discussion
+
+### Topic
+
+- [Ryan] Has there been prior work to automatically detect which Python functions exist
+  but aren't in the documentation? I'm imagining something like
+  [Moto's implementation coverage document](https://github.com/getmoto/moto/blob/master/IMPLEMENTATION_COVERAGE.md)
+  for Boto3, but for documentation coverage. This popped up after
+  [seeing a PR](https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/136024) to add documentation for
+  a missing function in `importlib.metadata`.
+
+  - Adam: this seems valuable, but not done before. Previously, we had talked about the
+    calendar module where we have intentionally non-documented features. It'd be good to
+    add the breakdown a dimension that indicates whether a function is intentionally not
+    documented or not. Additionally, an existing coverage tool (for example,
+    `sphinx.ext.coverage`) could be modified to come up with this list.
+
+  - Could be used as a central store of what is missing, what is intentionally missing,
+    perhaps a good 'place to get started' for newer contributors.
+
+  - Kattni: this could be valuable especially for getting new people involved and some
+    numbers around the coverage.
+
+- [Adam] I'd like to broach the idea of jargon being used in the standard library and
+  how to make it more effective.
+
+  - [Hugo] There are times in the stdlib where it's OK to rely on jargon.
+
+- Irvan: Some jargon should be kept in English because translating it will make it
+  harder to be understood, because then the target user will need to re-translate it to
+  English when reading. So perhaps, having a feature that when hover cross-references to
+  explain/disambiguate jargon?
+
+- Kattni: Recently wrote a guide on using a stdlib tool, but had to look up how to
+  properly reference various things. Specifically, referring to a module in the standard
+  library and initially got wording wrong.
+
+- Keith: Education & Outreach: Moving from planning to doing. Interested in resources
+  for (1) teachers, (2) individuals new to programming, (3) improving python.org.
+
+- Adam: we are reference-docs-biased, we have a high bounce rate.
+
+- Irvan: PHP docs allow comments (user contributed notes), but I am not really sure if
+  it is good if we follow that, so maybe we can allow that in other initiatives like the
+  new resources for teachers/beginners.
+
+- Ned: current [Report a Bug article](https://docs.python.org/3/bugs.html) could be
+  improved to better suggest improvements.
+
+  - Show source should link to raw rst code (`?plain=1`) rather than the render.
+
+- [Ryan]: could we gather all the docs referrer headers and see whether there's info to
+  be captured on the pages that are linking to the docs?

docs/monthly-meeting/index.rst

@@ -23,3 +23,4 @@ Monthly reports in chronological order.
    Apr 2025 <2025-04.md>
    May 2025 <2025-05.md>
    Jun 2025 <2025-06.md>
+   Jul 2025 <2025-07.md>