Skip to content

Conversation

@msullivan
Copy link
Collaborator

I was getting bizarre wasm failures from runtests running pre-commit
running actionlint running shellcheck (shellcheck is written in
haskell but we depend on go-shellcheck which is a packaged up version
of it using wasm?).
(#19958 (comment))

If I update it, I don't get bizarre wasm failures and it still doesn't
complain about anything.

I was getting bizarre wasm failures from runtests running pre-commit
running actionlint running shellcheck (shellcheck is written in
haskell but we depend on go-shellcheck which is a packaged up version
of it using wasm?).
(#19958 (comment))

If I update it, I don't get bizarre wasm failures and it still doesn't
complain about anything.
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 8, 2025

According to mypy_primer, this change doesn't affect type check results on a corpus of open source code. ✅

@wyattscarpenter
Copy link
Contributor

Out of curiosity, were you consistently able to replicate the problem on 0.10.0, and consistently unable to replicate it on 0.11.0? It seemed like a sporadic problem to me, which only struck at random. Of course, no harm in bumping the version even if it is sporadic...

@msullivan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Out of curiosity, were you consistently able to replicate the problem on 0.10.0, and consistently unable to replicate it on 0.11.0? It seemed like a sporadic problem to me, which only struck at random. Of course, no harm in bumping the version even if it is sporadic...

Yes

@hauntsaninja hauntsaninja merged commit d51fa00 into master Oct 9, 2025
20 checks passed
@hauntsaninja hauntsaninja deleted the update-shellcheck branch October 9, 2025 00:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants