- 
          
 - 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 3k
 
Fix annotated with function as type keyword list parameter #20094
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Open
      
      
            KarelKenens
  wants to merge
  7
  commits into
  python:master
  
    
      
        
          
  
    
      Choose a base branch
      
     
    
      
        
      
      
        
          
          
        
        
          
            
              
              
              
  
           
        
        
          
            
              
              
           
        
       
     
  
        
          
            
          
            
          
        
       
    
      
from
KarelKenens:fix-annotated-with-function-as-type-keyword-list-parameter
  
      
      
   
  
    
  
  
  
 
  
      
    base: master
Could not load branches
            
              
  
    Branch not found: {{ refName }}
  
            
                
      Loading
              
            Could not load tags
            
            
              Nothing to show
            
              
  
            
                
      Loading
              
            Are you sure you want to change the base?
            Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
            and old review comments may become outdated.
          
          
  
     Open
                    Changes from all commits
      Commits
    
    
            Show all changes
          
          
            7 commits
          
        
        Select commit
          Hold shift + click to select a range
      
      c7f95a4
              
                fix: add lookup_qualified
              
              
                KarelKenens b47d21e
              
                test: type keyword would fail before fix
              
              
                KarelKenens e3a9a3d
              
                Merge branch 'master' into fix-annotated-with-function-as-type-keywor…
              
              
                KarelKenens 777e4c3
              
                test: restructure to run with correct python version
              
              
                KarelKenens 8136e70
              
                Merge branch 'master' into fix-annotated-with-function-as-type-keywor…
              
              
                KarelKenens 0bd6bb5
              
                fix: pass through argument to all recursive calls
              
              
                KarelKenens 9ad2101
              
                test: deeper nested annotated
              
              
                KarelKenens File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
          Failed to load comments.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Jump to
        
          Jump to file
        
      
      
          Failed to load files.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's other recursion happening here, do you think it's a good idea to preemptively thread through
lookup_qualified?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not going to pretend I have a good understanding of the consequences. But I can trigger what is basically the same behaviour by nesting annotations. And to me it seems that the cause is indeed that
lookup_qualifiedis not being passed on in the recursions.This test passes.
This one does not (even after changes currently in this PR).
Can make the second one pass by pushing
lookup_qualifiedthrough to another recursive call.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe check blame to quickly look at the PR that introduced things (maybe it addresses this), but it sounds like it would be good to pass
lookup_qualifiedthrough.I suspect:
lookup_qualifiedlookup_qualifiedPR was part of a larger PR so this got missedUnfortunately I'm on mobile so blame UI kinda sucks :(
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
PR that added
lookup_qualifieddoesn't address passing through the argument.But as you said, the recursion was there already. An oversight sound plausible to me.
@A5rocks , should I add the passing through to this PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, please do. @JukkaL