-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 326
refactor common used toy model #2729
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
namgyu-youn
wants to merge
17
commits into
pytorch:main
Choose a base branch
from
namgyu-youn:refactor-toymodel
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 14 commits
Commits
Show all changes
17 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b2e7f54
Summary:
namgyu-youn c5faa07
fix ruff
namgyu-youn ddeb027
separate single/multi linear toy model
namgyu-youn 2aafd64
Summary:
namgyu-youn 68e4482
Merge branch 'main' into refactor-toymodel
namgyu-youn 6e88012
fix CI error after rebase
namgyu-youn 6fd9672
update 3-linear model to 2-linear model
namgyu-youn 98dd997
Merge branch 'main' into refactor-toymodel
namgyu-youn 1656126
revert: observer shape
namgyu-youn 994b507
revert: toy model for tutorials
namgyu-youn 0ced363
update dtype, device handling in ToyTwoLinearModel
namgyu-youn 6b03dc3
fix: test module for `create_model_and_input_data()`
namgyu-youn 6b4eaa8
revert: toy model for tutorials
namgyu-youn ee7b0f4
fix: uniform args (device & dtype) in ToyModel
namgyu-youn c8320a7
remove overused args: `sequence_length`
namgyu-youn b6a752e
revert edge-case to source: `test_awq.py`
namgyu-youn f3f0abd
refactor: inline for clear understanding
namgyu-youn File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since this is edge case (toy model architecture is quiet different), error range is adjusted for passing CI. We can try only checking loss_awq is generated (no matter error range), as discussed in #2728 (comment) for more brevity
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure we can do that, even the model changed, the loss should still be smaller I think, since that's waht awq is optimizing for
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe higher error comes from lower (3->2) layers. Because AWQ uses weight distribution in this implementation, 2-layers might not be adequate to compute distribution, making AWQ hard to learn. Also, there might not be enough outliers right now.