Fix bugs in executorch package #10251
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/10251
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ No FailuresAs of commit 99f9121 with merge base 1edf692 ( This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
facebook-github-bot
added
the
CLA Signed
Contributor
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73166222 |
Contributor
Author
|
@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing" |
danachang
changed the title
danachang
pushed a commit
to danachang/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2025
Summary: There were bugs in `executorch`, which did not update `InputRecorder` import from `torchao` given changes in the path, which also required adding dependency to import `lm_eval`. Differential Revision: D73166222
danachang
force-pushed
the
export-D73166222
branch
from
967d0b5 to
77797c2
Compare
Contributor
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73166222 |
danachang
pushed a commit
to danachang/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2025
Summary: There were bugs in `executorch`, which did not update `InputRecorder` import from `torchao` given changes in the path, which also required adding dependency to import `lm_eval`. Differential Revision: D73166222
danachang
force-pushed
the
export-D73166222
branch
from
77797c2 to
9e18a18
Compare
Contributor
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73166222 |
danachang
pushed a commit
to danachang/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2025
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#10251 There were bugs in `executorch`, which did not update `InputRecorder` import from `torchao` given changes in the path, which also required adding dependency to import `lm_eval`. Differential Revision: D73166222
danachang
force-pushed
the
export-D73166222
branch
from
9e18a18 to
238b7a8
Compare
danachang
pushed a commit
to danachang/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2025
Summary: There were bugs in `executorch`, which did not update `InputRecorder` import from `torchao` given changes in the path, which also required adding dependency to import `lm_eval`. Differential Revision: D73166222
danachang
force-pushed
the
export-D73166222
branch
from
238b7a8 to
f9520d3
Compare
Contributor
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73166222 |
danachang
pushed a commit
to danachang/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2025
Summary: There were bugs in `executorch`, which did not update `InputRecorder` import from `torchao` given changes in the path, which also required adding dependency to import `lm_eval`. Differential Revision: D73166222
danachang
force-pushed
the
export-D73166222
branch
from
f9520d3 to
c6367cc
Compare
Contributor
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73166222 |
danachang
pushed a commit
to danachang/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2025
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#10251 There were bugs in `executorch`, which did not update `InputRecorder` import from `torchao` given changes in the path, which also required adding dependency to import `lm_eval`. Differential Revision: D73166222
danachang
force-pushed
the
export-D73166222
branch
from
c6367cc to
3149297
Compare
danachang
pushed a commit
to danachang/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2025
Summary: There were bugs in `executorch`, which did not update `InputRecorder` import from `torchao` given changes in the path, which also required adding dependency to import `lm_eval`. Differential Revision: D73166222
danachang
force-pushed
the
export-D73166222
branch
from
3149297 to
d1fc97c
Compare
Contributor
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73166222 |
danachang
pushed a commit
to danachang/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2025
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#10251 There were bugs in `executorch`, which did not update `InputRecorder` import from `torchao` given changes in the path, which also required adding dependency to import `lm_eval`. Differential Revision: D73166222
danachang
force-pushed
the
export-D73166222
branch
from
d1fc97c to
ae09bc4
Compare
danachang
pushed a commit
to danachang/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2025
Summary: There were bugs in `executorch`, which did not update `InputRecorder` import from `torchao` given changes in the path, which also required adding dependency to import `lm_eval`. Differential Revision: D73166222
danachang
force-pushed
the
export-D73166222
branch
from
ae09bc4 to
e198117
Compare
danachang
pushed a commit
to danachang/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2025
Summary: There were bugs in `executorch`, which did not update `InputRecorder` import from `torchao` given changes in the path, which also required adding dependency to import `lm_eval`. Differential Revision: D73166222
danachang
force-pushed
the
export-D73166222
branch
from
e198117 to
762177a
Compare
Contributor
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73166222 |
danachang
pushed a commit
to danachang/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2025
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#10251 There were bugs in `executorch`, which did not update `InputRecorder` import from `torchao` given changes in the path, which also required adding dependency to import `lm_eval`. Differential Revision: D73166222
danachang
force-pushed
the
export-D73166222
branch
from
762177a to
069237a
Compare
Contributor
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73166222 |
danachang
pushed a commit
to danachang/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2025
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#10251 There were bugs in `executorch`, which did not update `InputRecorder` import from `torchao` given changes in the path, which also required adding dependency to import `lm_eval`. Differential Revision: D73166222
danachang
force-pushed
the
export-D73166222
branch
from
069237a to
68bad18
Compare
danachang
pushed a commit
to danachang/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2025
Summary: There were bugs in `executorch`, which did not update `InputRecorder` import from `torchao` given changes in the path, which also required adding dependency to import `lm_eval`. Differential Revision: D73166222
danachang
force-pushed
the
export-D73166222
branch
from
68bad18 to
632d9e6
Compare
Contributor
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73166222 |
danachang
pushed a commit
to danachang/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2025
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#10251 There were bugs in `executorch`, which did not update `InputRecorder` import from `torchao` given changes in the path, which also required adding dependency to import `lm_eval`. Differential Revision: D73166222
danachang
force-pushed
the
export-D73166222
branch
from
632d9e6 to
dedcf25
Compare
jackzhxng
approved these changes
Apr 17, 2025
danachang
force-pushed
the
export-D73166222
branch
from
dedcf25 to
adfd460
Compare
danachang
pushed a commit
to danachang/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2025
Summary: There were bugs in `executorch`, which did not update `InputRecorder` import from `torchao` given changes in the path, which also required adding dependency to import `lm_eval`. Reviewed By: metascroy, jackzhxng Differential Revision: D73166222
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#10251 There were bugs in `executorch`, which did not update `InputRecorder` import from `torchao` given changes in the path, which also required adding dependency to import `lm_eval`. Reviewed By: metascroy, jackzhxng Differential Revision: D73166222
danachang
force-pushed
the
export-D73166222
branch
from
adfd460 to
99f9121
Compare
Contributor
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73166222 |
keyprocedure
pushed a commit
to keyprocedure/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 21, 2025
Differential Revision: D73166222 Pull Request resolved: pytorch#10251
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary: There were bugs in
executorch, which did not updateInputRecorderimport fromtorchaogiven changes in the path, which also required adding dependency to importlm_eval.Differential Revision: D73166222