Skip to content

Conversation

@KamilMatejuk
Copy link

Summary

The current wording suggests to use generic Release note: backends for all backends, but that doesn't work. It should be specified to use the actual backend that is affected by PR.

The current information leads to misunderstandings like this one:
image

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jun 9, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/11470

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 3e117b5 with merge base f24351a (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Jun 9, 2025
@KamilMatejuk
Copy link
Author

@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the release notes: none Do not include this in the release notes label Jun 9, 2025
@KamilMatejuk KamilMatejuk changed the title Elaborate on the release notes labels. Elaborate on the release notes labels for backends Jun 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. release notes: none Do not include this in the release notes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants