Skip to content
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
69 changes: 68 additions & 1 deletion docs/source/backends-coreml.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -61,6 +61,9 @@ The CoreML partitioner API allows for configuration of the model delegation to C
- `skip_ops_for_coreml_delegation`: Allows you to skip ops for delegation by CoreML. By default, all ops that CoreML supports will be delegated. See [here](https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/14ff52ff89a89c074fc6c14d3f01683677783dcd/backends/apple/coreml/test/test_coreml_partitioner.py#L42) for an example of skipping an op for delegation.
- `compile_specs`: A list of `CompileSpec`s for the CoreML backend. These control low-level details of CoreML delegation, such as the compute unit (CPU, GPU, ANE), the iOS deployment target, and the compute precision (FP16, FP32). These are discussed more below.
- `take_over_mutable_buffer`: A boolean that indicates whether PyTorch mutable buffers in stateful models should be converted to [CoreML `MLState`](https://developer.apple.com/documentation/coreml/mlstate). If set to `False`, mutable buffers in the PyTorch graph are converted to graph inputs and outputs to the CoreML lowered module under the hood. Generally, setting `take_over_mutable_buffer` to true will result in better performance, but using `MLState` requires iOS >= 18.0, macOS >= 15.0, and Xcode >= 16.0.
- `take_over_constant_data`: A boolean that indicates whether PyTorch constant data like model weights should be consumed by the CoreML delegate. If set to False, constant data is passed to the CoreML delegate as inputs. By deafault, take_over_constant_data=True.
- `lower_full_graph`: A boolean that indicates whether the entire graph must be lowered to CoreML. If set to True and CoreML does not support an op, an error is raised during lowering. If set to False and CoreML does not support an op, the op is executed on the CPU by ExecuTorch. Although setting `lower_full_graph`=False can allow a model to lower where it would otherwise fail, it can introduce performance overhead in the model when there are unsupported ops. You will see warnings about unsupported ops during lowering if there are any. By default, `lower_full_graph`=False.


#### CoreML CompileSpec

Expand All @@ -70,10 +73,14 @@ A list of `CompileSpec`s is constructed with [`CoreMLBackend.generate_compile_sp
- `coremltools.ComputeUnit.CPU_ONLY` (uses the CPU only)
- `coremltools.ComputeUnit.CPU_AND_GPU` (uses both the CPU and GPU, but not the ANE)
- `coremltools.ComputeUnit.CPU_AND_NE` (uses both the CPU and ANE, but not the GPU)
- `minimum_deployment_target`: The minimum iOS deployment target (e.g., `coremltools.target.iOS18`). The default value is `coremltools.target.iOS15`.
- `minimum_deployment_target`: The minimum iOS deployment target (e.g., `coremltools.target.iOS18`). By default, the smallest deployment target needed to deploy the model is selected. During export, you will see a warning about the "CoreML specification version" that was used for the model, which maps onto a deployment target as discussed [here](https://apple.github.io/coremltools/mlmodel/Format/Model.html#model). If you need to control the deployment target, please specify it explicitly.
- `compute_precision`: The compute precision used by CoreML (`coremltools.precision.FLOAT16` or `coremltools.precision.FLOAT32`). The default value is `coremltools.precision.FLOAT16`. Note that the compute precision is applied no matter what dtype is specified in the exported PyTorch model. For example, an FP32 PyTorch model will be converted to FP16 when delegating to the CoreML backend by default. Also note that the ANE only supports FP16 precision.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Noob question, it seems we publish the default as FLOAT16 in the generate_compile_specs function, what happens when a quantizer, would the backend ignores this, or is it upto the user to make sure there is no compute_precision in compile specs?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Even for a quantized model, there is a compute precision. Compute precision controls the precision of the non-quantized ops in the model.

- `model_type`: Whether the model should be compiled to the CoreML [mlmodelc format](https://developer.apple.com/documentation/coreml/downloading-and-compiling-a-model-on-the-user-s-device) during .pte creation ([`CoreMLBackend.MODEL_TYPE.COMPILED_MODEL`](https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/14ff52ff89a89c074fc6c14d3f01683677783dcd/backends/apple/coreml/compiler/coreml_preprocess.py#L71)), or whether it should be compiled to mlmodelc on device ([`CoreMLBackend.MODEL_TYPE.MODEL`](https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/14ff52ff89a89c074fc6c14d3f01683677783dcd/backends/apple/coreml/compiler/coreml_preprocess.py#L70)). Using `CoreMLBackend.MODEL_TYPE.COMPILED_MODEL` and doing compilation ahead of time should improve the first time on-device model load time.

#### Backward compatibility

CoreML supports backward compatibility via the `minimum_deployment_target` option. A model exported with a specific deployment target is guaranteed to work on all deployment targets >= the specified deployment target. For example, a model exported with `coremltools.target.iOS17` will work on iOS 17 or higher.

### Testing the Model

After generating the CoreML-delegated .pte, the model can be tested from Python using the ExecuTorch runtime Python bindings. This can be used to quickly check the model and evaluate numerical accuracy. See [Testing the Model](using-executorch-export.md#testing-the-model) for more information.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -173,6 +180,66 @@ Quantizing activations requires calibrating the model on representative data. A

See [PyTorch 2 Export Post Training Quantization](https://docs.pytorch.org/ao/main/tutorials_source/pt2e_quant_ptq.html) for more information.

### LLM quantization with quantize_
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@metascroy Is there a minimum_deployment_target required/ published for Torchao quantization and PT2E quantization, i remember you mentioned it is None by default but how do we enforce if one is using quantization recipe.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CoreML should select the required minimum_deployment target automatically. For PT2E, it should select iOS17.

But for quantize_, I noticed it was only working for iOS18 now (need to investigate further): #13122

In terms of how do we enforce it: it should work automatically for PT2E, but let me know if it doesn't. For quantize_, I'll try to make it work automatically, but as an intermediate stop-gap, we can explicitly set to iOS18 if quantize_ is used in the recipe.


The CoreML backend also supports quantizing models with the [torchao](https://github.com/pytorch/ao) quantize_ API. This is most commonly used for LLMs, requiring more advanced quantization. Since quantize_ is not backend aware, it is important to use a config that is compatible with CoreML:

* Quantize embedding/linear layers with IntxWeightOnlyConfig (with weight_dtype torch.int4 or torch.int8, using PerGroup or PerAxis granularity)
* Quantize embedding/linear layers with CodebookWeightOnlyConfig (with dtype torch.uint1 through torch.uint8, using various block sizes)

Below is an example that quantizes embeddings to 8-bits per-axis and linear layers to 4-bits using group_size=32 with affine quantization:

```python
from torchao.quantization.granularity import PerGroup, PerAxis
from torchao.quantization.quant_api import (
IntxWeightOnlyConfig,
quantize_,
)

# Quantize embeddings with 8-bits, per channel
embedding_config = IntxWeightOnlyConfig(
weight_dtype=torch.int8,
granularity=PerAxis(0),
)
qunatize_(
eager_model,
lambda m, fqn: isinstance(m, torch.nn.Embedding),
)

# Quantize linear layers with 4-bits, per-group
linear_config = IntxWeightOnlyConfig(
weight_dtype=torch.int4,
granularity=PerGroup(32),
)
quantize_(
eager_model,
linear_config,
)
```

Below is another example that uses codebook quantization to quantize both embeddings and linear layers to 3-bits.
In the coremltools documentation, this is called [palettization](https://apple.github.io/coremltools/docs-guides/source/opt-palettization-overview.html):

```
from torchao.quantization.quant_api import (
quantize_,
)
from torchao.prototype.quantization.codebook_coreml import CodebookWeightOnlyConfig

quant_config = CodebookWeightOnlyConfig(
dtype=torch.uint3,
# There is one LUT per 16 columns
block_size=[-1, 16],
)

quantize_(
eager_model,
quant_config,
lambda m, fqn: isinstance(m, torch.nn.Embedding) or isinstance(m, torch.nn.Linear),
)
```

Both of the above examples will export and lower to CoreML with the to_edge_transform_and_lower API.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

how does codebook one actually lower to coreml? I tried looking up choose_qparams_and_quantize_codebook in et and coremltools but didnt find anythibng

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From a user's perspective, it should just lower: after quantize_, you can run torch.export.export, and then to_edge_transform_and_lower.

In terms of how it works, I added the ability to register custom MIL ops in ET CoreML, and I used that to register the dequantize_codebook quant primitive that is produced by CodebookWeightOnlyConfig.


----

Expand Down
Loading