Skip to content

Conversation

@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor

@swolchok swolchok commented Aug 12, 2025

No description provided.

[ghstack-poisoned]
@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor Author

swolchok commented Aug 12, 2025

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Aug 12, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/13334

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 4 New Failures, 4 Cancelled Jobs

As of commit 8c7ef6e with merge base 8e73c09 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

CANCELLED JOBS - The following jobs were cancelled. Please retry:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

swolchok added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2025
ghstack-source-id: 9c8ecd3
ghstack-comment-id: 3180462103
Pull-Request: #13334
@meta-cla meta-cla bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Aug 12, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
swolchok added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2025
ghstack-source-id: 290b403
ghstack-comment-id: 3180462103
Pull-Request: #13334
@swolchok swolchok added the release notes: none Do not include this in the release notes label Aug 12, 2025
@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor Author

failing zephyr jobs seem to be using the old version of bit_cast.h somehow. inclined to ignore those and hope they clear on land, but I'll see if I can find anyone else who has seen this behavior first.

unittest-arm-backend-with-no-fvp (test_pytest_ops) / linux-job (pull_request) failure looks like a flake, rerunning.

@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor Author

happy to ignore test-llava-runner-linux failure; it's known to segfault sometimes

@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor Author

it looks like zephyr is somehow pinned to an old executorch version. going to talk to @BujSet soon

@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor Author

@BujSet says we can have zephyr tests point at the current ExecuTorch source and he'll try to get around to that soon.

@psiddh psiddh self-requested a review August 19, 2025 20:16
@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor Author

zephyr jobs are now disabled in CI, so I'm discounting those failures and merging.

@swolchok swolchok merged commit d1b539d into main Aug 20, 2025
305 of 316 checks passed
@swolchok swolchok deleted the gh/swolchok/533/head branch August 20, 2025 17:21
swolchok added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2025
Another torch/headeronly kerfuffle.


ghstack-source-id: 56abe75
ghstack-comment-id: 3211301113
Pull-Request: #13582
swolchok added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2025
Another torch/headeronly kerfuffle.

ghstack-source-id: 7ae5ea0
ghstack-comment-id: 3211301113
Pull-Request: #13582
swolchok added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2025
agrima1304 pushed a commit to agrima1304/executorch that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2025
agrima1304 pushed a commit to agrima1304/executorch that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. release notes: none Do not include this in the release notes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants