-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 687
Compile and deploy QNN models to S24 #5137
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/5137
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)As of commit 7863773 with merge base 07e15a9 ( FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
962be33
to
4ef9f4d
Compare
4ef9f4d
to
e320442
Compare
Scheduled job: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/actions/runs/10746356523. Let's see if app can be installed and run on S24 |
@guangy10 has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! Let's see if the benchmark job passes
We should expect (stories110M, xnnpack) working on S24. That's the only thing we should look at. Other models will fail until @kirklandsign has the test-spec updated for the minibench and the minibench is built with both xnn & qnn backends. |
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/actions/runs/10746356523/job/29807680315
It seems like the app is installed but some permission is not granted? @huydhn @kirklandsign |
e320442
to
e09a7db
Compare
e09a7db
to
7863773
Compare
@guangy10 has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
No description provided.