- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 706
[ET-VK] Don't specify memory layouts when testing #7322
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
As title. Now that we have a memory metadata tagging pass that automatically determines the optimal memory layout to use for operators, there is no need to specify what memory layout to test in the Python export tests. There were some issues with the memory metadata tagging pass when dealing with nodes that contain tensor lists, which have been fixed as part of this diff as well. Differential Revision: [D67180897](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D67180897/) [ghstack-poisoned]
| 🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/7322
 Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 1 New Failure, 1 Cancelled JobAs of commit 060c7ea with merge base 0b1c1e5 ( NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:
 
 This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. | 
As title. Now that we have a memory metadata tagging pass that automatically determines the optimal memory layout to use for operators, there is no need to specify what memory layout to test in the Python export tests. There were some issues with the memory metadata tagging pass when dealing with nodes that contain tensor lists, which have been fixed as part of this diff as well. Differential Revision: [D67180897](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D67180897/) ghstack-source-id: 258028337 Pull Request resolved: #7322
| This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D67180897 | 
0859efb
      into
      
  
    gh/SS-JIA/155/base
  
    As title. Now that we have a memory metadata tagging pass that automatically determines the optimal memory layout to use for operators, there is no need to specify what memory layout to test in the Python export tests. There were some issues with the memory metadata tagging pass when dealing with nodes that contain tensor lists, which have been fixed as part of this diff as well. Differential Revision: [D67180897](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D67180897/) ghstack-source-id: 258028337 Pull Request resolved: #7322 Co-authored-by: Stephen Jia <[email protected]>
| (torch.rand(size=[1, 5, 2, 3]),), | ||
| memory_layouts=[vk_graph_schema.VkMemoryLayout.TENSOR_CHANNELS_PACKED], | ||
| ) | ||
|  | 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Out of sync?
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
As title. Now that we have a memory metadata tagging pass that automatically determines the optimal memory layout to use for operators, there is no need to specify what memory layout to test in the Python export tests.
There were some issues with the memory metadata tagging pass when dealing with nodes that contain tensor lists, which have been fixed as part of this diff as well.
Differential Revision: D67180897