Fix comment in memory_planning.py

[kimishpatel]

Summary:
Earlier commit left a dangling comment.

Test Plan:
CI

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

Summary

[PLEASE REMOVE] See CONTRIBUTING.md's Pull Requests for ExecuTorch PR guidelines.

[PLEASE REMOVE] If this PR closes an issue, please add a Fixes #<issue-id> line.

[PLEASE REMOVE] If this PR introduces a fix or feature that should be the upcoming release notes, please add a "Release notes: " label. For a list of available release notes labels, check out CONTRIBUTING.md's Pull Requests.

Test plan

[PLEASE REMOVE] How did you test this PR? Please write down any manual commands you used and note down tests that you have written if applicable.

[pytorch-bot]

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/8010

• 📄 Preview Python docs built from this PR

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 1 New Failure, 2 Pending

As of commit d36071f with merge base 3540723 ():

NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:

• Check Labels / Check labels (gh)
  RuntimeError: Error checking labels: PR does not have required labels

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

[github-actions]

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your changes are user facing and intended to be a part of release notes, please use a label starting with release notes:.

If not, please add the topic: not user facing label.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

[JacobSzwejbka]

Can you mention this is for alignment. And open an issue and link it to this around the problem of delegates wanting to surface that they have alignment requirements for inputs

[kimishpatel]

To be sure this is not for alignment. It is for out-of-bounds access. I thought we did allow for alignment requirements from delegates elsewhere

[JacobSzwejbka]

Oh yeah sorry not alignment, padding.

[digantdesai]

ah didn't mean to approve.

[kimishpatel]

thanks for commenting. forgot about this pr. let me update and land