fix not unique UUID in native gates rotation

[RoyStegeman]

When creating a rotation from a SingleQubtNatives instance, make sure… that the returned gates are unique instances

Without this, when running AllXY gates such as X9-Yp had the same UUID. This caused problems with the qblox driver.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 40.08%. Comparing base (d3bc9a7) to head (05fb160).
⚠️ Report is 73 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/qibolab/_core/native.py	50.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1357   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   40.08%   40.08%           
=======================================
  Files         114      114           
  Lines        5596     5596           
=======================================
  Hits         2243     2243           
  Misses       3353     3353           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	40.08% <50.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This pull request fixes a bug where rotation gates created from SingleQubitNatives instances would share the same UUID, causing issues with the qblox driver. The fix ensures that each rotation gate gets a unique UUID by calling the Native objects as functions (invoking create_sequence()) rather than passing them directly.

Changes:

• Modified SingleQubitNatives.R() method to call self.RX90() and self.RX() instead of passing the Native objects directly

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[Copilot]

The UUID uniqueness behavior fixed by calling self.RX90() and self.RX() lacks test coverage. Consider adding a test to verify that multiple calls to SingleQubitNatives.R() with different parameters return sequences with unique pulse UUIDs, similar to the existing test in test_fixed_sequence_factory that checks fseq1[0][1].id != fseq2[0][1].id.

[RoyStegeman]

@copilot commit on this branch changes based on this feedback

[Copilot]

@RoyStegeman I've opened a new pull request, #1358, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you.