Skip to content

Conversation

@tomerqodo
Copy link

Benchmark PR from qodo-benchmark#706

dhairyashiil and others added 7 commits January 21, 2026 15:42
Addresses Cubic AI review feedback (confidence 9/10): The username was
hardcoded to 'username' but still used by BasicsTab as a fallback for
URL display when bookingUrl is unavailable. This restores the useEffect
that fetches the actual username from CalComAPIService.getUsername().

Co-Authored-By: unknown <>
const [conferencingOptions, setConferencingOptions] = useState<ConferencingOption[]>([]);
const [conferencingLoading, setConferencingLoading] = useState(false);
const [eventTypeData, setEventTypeData] = useState<EventType | null>(null);
const [bookingUrl, setBookingUrl] = useState<string>("");
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bug: The applyEventTypeData function doesn't populate the bookingUrl state from the API response, causing features that rely on it to fail.
Severity: HIGH

Suggested Fix

In the applyEventTypeData function, add a line to update the bookingUrl state from the eventType parameter. For example: if (eventType.bookingUrl) { setBookingUrl(eventType.bookingUrl); }.

Prompt for AI Agent
Review the code at the location below. A potential bug has been identified by an AI
agent.
Verify if this is a real issue. If it is, propose a fix; if not, explain why it's not
valid.

Location: companion/app/(tabs)/(event-types)/event-type-detail.tsx#L180

Potential issue: The `bookingUrl` state, declared with `useState`, is never updated with
the value from the API response within the `applyEventTypeData` function. Consequently,
`bookingUrl` remains an empty string. This causes the `handlePreview()` and
`handleCopyLink()` functions to always fail and show an error, as they check if
`bookingUrl` is falsy. This breaks the "Preview" and "Copy Link" functionality for event
types, which is a core feature this pull request aims to address.

Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants