Skip to content

Conversation

@hila-f-qodo
Copy link

@hila-f-qodo hila-f-qodo commented Jan 26, 2026

Benchmark PR from qodo-benchmark#439


Open with Devin

Copy link

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Devin Review found 1 potential issue.

View issue and 4 additional flags in Devin Review.

Open in Devin Review

}
handlePayloadChange('json_schema')(JSON.stringify(res, null, 2))
handlePayloadChange('json_schema')(value)
return True

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔴 Python-style True used instead of JavaScript true causes ReferenceError

The handleJSONSchemaChange function returns True (Python-style boolean) instead of true (JavaScript/TypeScript boolean), which will cause a ReferenceError: True is not defined at runtime.

Click to expand

Bug Details

At line 139, the code returns True after successfully parsing JSON:

try {
  const v = JSON.parse(value)
  handlePayloadChange('json_schema')(value)
  return True  // BUG: should be `true`
}

In JavaScript/TypeScript, the boolean literal is lowercase true, not True. The identifier True is not defined anywhere in the codebase, so this will throw a ReferenceError when the function is called with valid JSON input.

Impact

When a user enters valid JSON in the JSON Schema editor for a JSON Object variable type, the application will crash with:

ReferenceError: True is not defined

This completely breaks the JSON_OBJECT type support feature that this PR is trying to enable.

Expected vs Actual

  • Expected: The function should return true to indicate successful JSON parsing
  • Actual: The function returns True which is undefined, causing a runtime error

Recommendation: Change return True to return true (lowercase)

Open in Devin Review

Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants