-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
fix: remove hardcoded 48-character limit from text inputs #18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: devin_pr_code_review_bench_100_devin2_base_fix_remove_hardcoded_48-character_limit_from_text_inputs_pr417
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| if (item[varIndex].length > varItem.max_length) { | ||
| moreThanMaxLengthVarName = varItem.name | ||
| maxLength = maxLen | ||
| maxLength = varItem.max_length | ||
| errorRowIndex = index + 1 | ||
| return | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🔴 Batch validation bypassed when max_length is undefined - comparison with undefined always returns false
When max_length is not set (undefined), the batch input validation for string length is completely bypassed.
Click to expand
Root Cause
The PR removes the fallback to DEFAULT_VALUE_MAX_LEN in several places. In the batch validation code at web/app/components/share/text-generation/index.tsx:261, when varItem.max_length is undefined, the comparison:
if (item[varIndex].length > varItem.max_length)will always evaluate to false because in JavaScript, comparing any number with undefined returns false:
100 > undefined // false
0 > undefined // falseImpact
For batch operations on text generation apps, if a prompt variable doesn't have a max_length set, users can submit inputs of any length without validation. This could lead to:
- Unexpected behavior when very long strings are submitted
- Potential issues with downstream processing that may have implicit length limits
- Inconsistent behavior between batch and single-run modes
Expected vs Actual
- Expected: When
max_lengthis undefined, either skip the check entirely (no limit) or use a sensible default - Actual: The check runs but always passes due to the
undefinedcomparison quirk
Recommendation: Add a guard condition to skip the max_length check when it's undefined: if (varItem.max_length !== undefined && item[varIndex].length > varItem.max_length)
Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.
| return false | ||
| } | ||
| const headerData = data[0] | ||
| console.log('Checking batch inputs:', { dataLength: data.length, headerData }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🟡 Debug console.log statement left in production code
A console.log statement was added to the batch input validation function, which violates coding standards and should not be in production code.
Click to expand
Location
web/app/components/share/text-generation/index.tsx:199
console.log('Checking batch inputs:', { dataLength: data.length, headerData })Impact
- Pollutes browser console in production
- Potentially exposes internal data structures to end users
- Violates AGENTS.md rule fix(api): refactors the SQL LIKE pattern escaping logic to use a centralized utility function, ensuring consistent and secure handling of special characters across all database queries. #25: "Frontend Code Must Not Use console Statements"
Recommendation: Remove the console.log statement or replace with proper logging mechanism.
Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.
Benchmark PR from qodo-benchmark#417