Skip to content

Conversation

@tomerqodo
Copy link

Benchmark PR from agentic-review-benchmarks#11

@qodo-code-review
Copy link

Code Review by Qodo

🐞 Bugs (1) 📘 Rule violations (2) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)

Grey Divider


Action required

1. Pydantic v1 Config used 📘 Rule violation ⛨ Security
Description
AgentThoughtValidation defines class Config with extra = "allow", which is Pydantic v1-style
  configuration and permits undeclared fields to pass validation.
• This violates the requirement to use Pydantic v2 configuration patterns
  (ConfigDict(extra='forbid')) and weakens validation guarantees for data persisted to the database.
Code

api/core/agent/base_agent_runner.py[R64-65]

+    class Config:
+        extra = "allow"  # Pydantic v1 syntax - should use ConfigDict(extra='forbid')
Evidence
PR Compliance ID 20 requires Pydantic v2 patterns and forbidding extra fields by default via
ConfigDict(extra='forbid'). The added model uses v1 class Config and explicitly allows extra
fields (extra = "allow").

AGENTS.md
api/core/agent/base_agent_runner.py[52-66]

Agent prompt
The issue below was found during a code review. Follow the provided context and guidance below and implement a solution

## Issue description
`AgentThoughtValidation` uses Pydantic v1-style `class Config` and allows extra fields (`extra = "allow"`), violating the project requirement to use Pydantic v2 patterns and forbid undeclared fields by default.

## Issue Context
The compliance rule requires Pydantic v2 configuration via `ConfigDict(extra='forbid')` (and v2 validator patterns).

## Fix Focus Areas
- api/core/agent/base_agent_runner.py[52-66]

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools


2. Swallowed JSON parse exceptions 📘 Rule violation ✧ Quality
Description
json.loads() failures for tool_input_payload and observation_payload are caught with broad
  except Exception and silently replaced with defaults.
• This hides malformed data problems (no actionable context/logging), making production debugging
  and edge-case diagnosis significantly harder.
Code

api/core/agent/base_agent_runner.py[R471-483]

+                            try:
+                                tool_inputs = json.loads(tool_input_payload)
+                            except Exception:
+                                tool_inputs = {tool: {} for tool in tool_names}
+                        else:
+                            tool_inputs = {tool: {} for tool in tool_names}
+
+                        observation_payload = agent_thought.observation
+                        if observation_payload:
+                            try:
+                                tool_responses = json.loads(observation_payload)
+                            except Exception:
+                                tool_responses = dict.fromkeys(tool_names, observation_payload)
Evidence
PR Compliance ID 3 requires robust error handling with meaningful context; PR Compliance ID 28
requires debuggable logging with proper context. The new code adds broad except Exception blocks
around JSON parsing and does not log any details about the failure, which is a swallowed exception
without logging/context.

Rule 3: Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management
AGENTS.md
api/core/agent/base_agent_runner.py[469-485]

Agent prompt
The issue below was found during a code review. Follow the provided context and guidance below and implement a solution

## Issue description
The code broadly catches `Exception` during JSON parsing and silently falls back to defaults without logging, which swallows errors and removes critical debugging context.

## Issue Context
This runs while building agent history; malformed JSON should be handled gracefully but still produce actionable logs with identifiers.

## Fix Focus Areas
- api/core/agent/base_agent_runner.py[469-485]

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools


3. Tool output uses inputs 🐞 Bug ✓ Correctness
Description
• ToolPromptMessage.content is populated from parsed tool *inputs* rather than parsed tool
  *responses/observation*, so the model will “see” arguments as if they were tool results.
• This breaks tool-call chains (the assistant cannot incorporate real tool outputs) and can cause
  incorrect reasoning/actions across all agent conversations that rely on history replay.
Code

api/core/agent/base_agent_runner.py[R500-505]

                            tool_call_response.append(
                                ToolPromptMessage(
-                                    content=tool_responses.get(tool, agent_thought.observation),
+                                    content=str(tool_inputs.get(tool, agent_thought.observation)),
                                    name=tool,
                                    tool_call_id=tool_call_id,
                                )
Evidence
In organize_agent_history, the code correctly parses tool_responses from
agent_thought.observation, but when emitting the TOOL-role message it uses tool_inputs instead,
making the tool output wrong. ToolPromptMessage is explicitly the TOOL-role message, and
PromptMessage.content is expected to be a string (or multimodal list), so the fix should use the
observation-derived payload and stringify/JSON-encode as needed.

api/core/agent/base_agent_runner.py[460-506]
api/core/model_runtime/entities/message_entities.py[143-151]
api/core/model_runtime/entities/message_entities.py[266-273]

Agent prompt
The issue below was found during a code review. Follow the provided context and guidance below and implement a solution

### Issue description
`organize_agent_history` emits TOOL-role messages with the tool **inputs** instead of the tool **outputs**. This corrupts the reconstructed conversation history and breaks model tool-call reasoning.

### Issue Context
- `tool_inputs` comes from `agent_thought.tool_input`.
- `tool_responses` comes from `agent_thought.observation`.
- `ToolPromptMessage.content` should represent the tool result and should be a string (or multimodal content).

### Fix Focus Areas
- api/core/agent/base_agent_runner.py[460-506]
- api/core/model_runtime/entities/message_entities.py[143-151]

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools



ⓘ The new review experience is currently in Beta. Learn more

Qodo Logo

Comment on lines +64 to +65
class Config:
extra = "allow" # Pydantic v1 syntax - should use ConfigDict(extra='forbid')

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Action required

1. Pydantic v1 config used 📘 Rule violation ⛨ Security

AgentThoughtValidation defines class Config with extra = "allow", which is Pydantic v1-style
  configuration and permits undeclared fields to pass validation.
• This violates the requirement to use Pydantic v2 configuration patterns
  (ConfigDict(extra='forbid')) and weakens validation guarantees for data persisted to the database.
Agent prompt
## Issue description
`AgentThoughtValidation` uses Pydantic v1-style `class Config` and allows extra fields (`extra = "allow"`), violating the project requirement to use Pydantic v2 patterns and forbid undeclared fields by default.

## Issue Context
The compliance rule requires Pydantic v2 configuration via `ConfigDict(extra='forbid')` (and v2 validator patterns).

## Fix Focus Areas
- api/core/agent/base_agent_runner.py[52-66]

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools

Comment on lines +471 to +483
try:
tool_inputs = json.loads(tool_input_payload)
except Exception:
tool_inputs = {tool: {} for tool in tool_names}
else:
tool_inputs = {tool: {} for tool in tool_names}

observation_payload = agent_thought.observation
if observation_payload:
try:
tool_responses = json.loads(observation_payload)
except Exception:
tool_responses = dict.fromkeys(tool_names, observation_payload)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Action required

2. Swallowed json parse exceptions 📘 Rule violation ✧ Quality

json.loads() failures for tool_input_payload and observation_payload are caught with broad
  except Exception and silently replaced with defaults.
• This hides malformed data problems (no actionable context/logging), making production debugging
  and edge-case diagnosis significantly harder.
Agent prompt
## Issue description
The code broadly catches `Exception` during JSON parsing and silently falls back to defaults without logging, which swallows errors and removes critical debugging context.

## Issue Context
This runs while building agent history; malformed JSON should be handled gracefully but still produce actionable logs with identifiers.

## Fix Focus Areas
- api/core/agent/base_agent_runner.py[469-485]

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools

Comment on lines 500 to 505
tool_call_response.append(
ToolPromptMessage(
content=tool_responses.get(tool, agent_thought.observation),
content=str(tool_inputs.get(tool, agent_thought.observation)),
name=tool,
tool_call_id=tool_call_id,
)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Action required

3. Tool output uses inputs 🐞 Bug ✓ Correctness

• ToolPromptMessage.content is populated from parsed tool *inputs* rather than parsed tool
  *responses/observation*, so the model will “see” arguments as if they were tool results.
• This breaks tool-call chains (the assistant cannot incorporate real tool outputs) and can cause
  incorrect reasoning/actions across all agent conversations that rely on history replay.
Agent prompt
### Issue description
`organize_agent_history` emits TOOL-role messages with the tool **inputs** instead of the tool **outputs**. This corrupts the reconstructed conversation history and breaks model tool-call reasoning.

### Issue Context
- `tool_inputs` comes from `agent_thought.tool_input`.
- `tool_responses` comes from `agent_thought.observation`.
- `ToolPromptMessage.content` should represent the tool result and should be a string (or multimodal content).

### Fix Focus Areas
- api/core/agent/base_agent_runner.py[460-506]
- api/core/model_runtime/entities/message_entities.py[143-151]

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants