fix: missing i18n translation for Trans#82
Conversation
Code Review by Qodo (Alpha)
1. `tsconfig` sets `strict` false
|
![qodo-code-review[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/484649?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| "types": ["vitest/globals", "node"], | ||
| "allowJs": true, | ||
| "strict": true, | ||
| "strict": false, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
1. tsconfig sets strict false 📘 Rule Violation
• The PR changes TypeScript configuration to disable strict mode, reducing type safety across the frontend codebase. • This directly conflicts with the requirement to use strict typing and avoid weakening the type system, increasing risk of runtime errors and inadvertent any/unsafe typing. • Re-enabling strict mode preserves the project’s intended strict type-checking guarantees.
Agent Prompt
## Issue description
The frontend TypeScript configuration disables `strict` mode (`"strict": false`), which violates the requirement to use strict typing and avoid weakening type safety.
## Issue Context
The compliance checklist requires strict TypeScript typing; disabling `strict` can allow unsafe typing patterns to slip in and hide type errors.
## Fix Focus Areas
- web/tsconfig.json[24-24]
ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools
Comment on lines
163
to
167
| await sendEmail( | ||
| mail, | ||
| email, | ||
| false, | ||
| stepToken, | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
2. Email code sent wrong 🐞 Bug
• New-email verification validates the user-entered mail but sends the verification code to the old email prop instead. • Because the backend request is tagged as phase: 'new_email', this can prevent users from receiving a code at the intended new address and block email changes.
Agent Prompt
### Issue description
On the "send code to new email" step, the code validates `mail` (new email input) but calls `sendEmail(email, false, stepToken)` using the old email prop. Since `sendEmail` uses `phase: 'new_email'` for `isOrigin=false`, the verification code can be sent to the wrong address and block the email-change flow.
### Issue Context
`sendEmail()` forwards the provided address directly to `sendVerifyCode()`, and selects the backend phase based on `isOrigin`.
### Fix Focus Areas
- web/app/account/(commonLayout)/account-page/email-change-modal.tsx[155-169]
- web/app/account/(commonLayout)/account-page/email-change-modal.tsx[61-70]
### Suggested change
- Replace the `sendEmail(email, false, stepToken)` call with `sendEmail(mail, false, stepToken)`.
- (Optional hardening) Have `sendEmail` return success/failure (or rethrow on failure) and only call `setStep(STEP.verifyNew)` when the send succeeds.
ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools
Comment on lines
+37
to
42
| i18nKey="table.empty.element.content" | ||
| ns="appLog" | ||
| components={{ | ||
| shareLink: <Link href={`${appDetail.site.app_base_url}${basePath}/${getWebAppType(appDetail.mode)}/${appDetail.site.access_token}`} className="text-util-colors-blue-blue-600" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" />, | ||
| testLink: <Link href={getRedirectionPath(true, appDetail)} className="text-util-colors-blue-blue-600" />, | ||
| testLink: <Link href={getRedirectionPath(false, appDetail)} className="text-util-colors-blue-blue-600" />, | ||
| }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
3. Logs empty link misroutes 🐞 Bug
• The empty logs screen now hardcodes getRedirectionPath(false, appDetail) which always routes to /overview. • The logs route is already guarded to editors; routing editors to overview instead of configuration/workflow breaks the expected "test the app" navigation from logs.
Agent Prompt
### Issue description
The empty logs CTA now calls `getRedirectionPath(false, ...)`, which always routes to `/overview`. But the logs route is guarded to editors, so the CTA should route to editor pages (`/workflow` or `/configuration`) when testing the app.
### Issue Context
`getRedirectionPath` uses its boolean parameter to decide whether to route to editor pages vs overview.
### Fix Focus Areas
- web/app/components/app/log/empty-element.tsx[35-43]
- web/utils/app-redirection.ts[3-15]
### Suggested change
- Prefer: import `useAppContext()` and pass `isCurrentWorkspaceEditor` into `getRedirectionPath(isCurrentWorkspaceEditor, appDetail)`.
- If logs are truly editor-only everywhere, revert the hardcoded argument back to `true`.
ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools
Comment on lines
94
to
97
| const sendCodeToOriginEmail = async () => { | ||
| await sendEmail() | ||
| setStep(STEP.verify) | ||
| await sendEmail() | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
4. Ownership token race 🐞 Bug
• The modal transitions to the verify step before the async send finishes, so the verify UI can render while stepToken is still empty. • This makes it possible to submit a code with an empty/stale token (e.g., fast paste / repeated attempts), causing avoidable verification failures.
Agent Prompt
### Issue description
`setStep(STEP.verify)` now happens before the async email-send finishes. This can render the verify screen before `stepToken` is available, allowing verification requests with an empty/stale token.
### Issue Context
`stepToken` is set only after `sendOwnerEmail()` resolves; verification passes `stepToken` as `token`.
### Fix Focus Areas
- web/app/components/header/account-setting/members-page/transfer-ownership-modal/index.tsx[94-101]
- web/app/components/header/account-setting/members-page/transfer-ownership-modal/index.tsx[54-67]
### Suggested change
- Revert ordering: `await sendEmail(); setStep(STEP.verify);`.
- Add `isSending` state: show loading/disable Continue/Resend until `stepToken` is set.
- Consider having `sendEmail()` return the token (or throw on failure) so the caller can gate the step transition on success.
ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Benchmark PR from qodo-benchmark#137