Skip to content

Conversation

@basak-qcom
Copy link
Contributor

This is similar to qualcomm-linux/meta-qcom#886 and should bring at least one bug fix for QCM6490 (RB3Gen2).

Fixes: #106

This is similar to qualcomm-linux/meta-qcom#886 and should bring at
least one bug fix for QCM6490 (RB3Gen2).

Fixes: qualcomm-linux#106
Signed-off-by: Robie Basak <[email protected]>
@basak-qcom
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks like there's an unrelated CI failure here, and it has been failing for a while :-/

@basak-qcom basak-qcom self-assigned this Jul 25, 2025
debos has an outstanding feature request to make this integrated in
go-debos/debos#120. In the meantime, we can do this manually by invoking
sha256sum in check mode directly.

We're downloading qcom-ptool directly from the tip of the main branch,
so verifying that download seems less practical. In future, we could tag
a release there, and then pin to that, at which point verifying the hash
of the result would make more sense.

Signed-off-by: Robie Basak <[email protected]>
@basak-qcom
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for the tip! This is ready to land now I think, subject to review.

@basak-qcom
Copy link
Contributor Author

@github-actions
Copy link

Test Results

 3 files  ±0   5 suites  ±0   17m 12s ⏱️ ±0s
17 tests ±0  13 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  4 ❌ ±0 
54 runs  ±0  50 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  4 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 9536830. ± Comparison against base commit 48071a4.

@github-actions
Copy link

@lool
Copy link
Contributor

lool commented Aug 1, 2025

Test failures were from unrelated initial rb1 run

@lool lool merged commit c30b5c1 into qualcomm-linux:main Aug 1, 2025
9 of 10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update to QLI 95 boot binaries

2 participants