Remove annotation due Quarkus only supports CDI-lite specification #1372
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Matheus Cruz <[email protected]>
Member
Author
|
@gabriel-farache could you take a review? |
ricardozanini
approved these changes
Nov 7, 2025
Contributor
|
@mcruzdev please cherry pick this to the main-lts branch. |
mcruzdev
added a commit
to mcruzdev/quarkus-openapi-generator
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 10, 2025
…uarkiverse#1372) Signed-off-by: Matheus Cruz <[email protected]>
7 tasks
Member
Author
|
Oh... I forget the label. I opened here #1377 |
ricardozanini
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 10, 2025
…1372) (#1377) Signed-off-by: Matheus Cruz <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I am removing the
@Specializesannotation, due to Quarkus only supports CDI-lite.Additionally, I added an advice the user in the documentation about the precedence over the default implementation.
This pull request aims to unblock the #1368 pull request.