feat: Add support for ClientMultipartForm

[matheusandre1]

Many thanks for submitting your Pull Request ❤️!

Please make sure that your PR meets the following requirements:

• You have read the contributors guide
• Your code is properly formatted according to our code style
• Pull Request title contains the target branch if not targeting main: [0.9.x] Subject
• Pull Request contains link to the issue Closes: Add support for ClientMultipartForm #1426
• Pull Request contains link to any dependent or related Pull Request
• Pull Request contains description of the issue
• Pull Request does not include fixes for issues other than the main ticket

How to backport a pull request to a different branch?

In order to automatically create a backporting pull request please add one or more labels having the following format backport-<branch-name>, where <branch-name> is the name of the branch where the pull request must be backported to (e.g., backport-quarkus2 to backport the original PR to the quarkus2 branch).

NOTE: backporting is an action aiming to move a change (usually a commit) from a branch (usually the main one) to another one, which is generally referring to a still maintained release branch. Keeping it simple: it is about to move a specific change or a set of them from one branch to another.

Once the original pull request is successfully merged, the automated action will create one backporting pull request per each label (with the previous format) that has been added.

If something goes wrong, the author will be notified and at this point a manual backporting is needed.

NOTE: this automated backporting is triggered whenever a pull request on main branch is labeled or closed, but both conditions must be satisfied to get the new PR created.

[mcruzdev]

@matheusandre1 It looks really great, could you add an integration-tests with the application.properties enabling this feature?

I tried this one in a custom project, but without success, I need more time to investigate... with an integration-tests we can get the issue.

The integration-tests should be a new module like in https://github.com/quarkiverse/quarkus-openapi-generator/tree/main/client/integration-tests testing your changes.

[matheusandre1]

Okay, put that into draft then, I'll send a PR of the changes later.

[mcruzdev]

No worries,it is solid and clear!

[mcruzdev]

Hey guy! Looking the CI I think we need two profiles:

<profile>
      <id>resteasy-reactive</id>
      <dependencies>
        <dependency>
          <groupId>io.quarkus</groupId>
          <artifactId>quarkus-rest-client-jackson</artifactId>
        </dependency>
      </dependencies>
    </profile>
    <profile>
      <id>resteasy-classic</id>
      <activation>
        <activeByDefault>true</activeByDefault>
      </activation>
      <dependencies>
        <dependency>
          <groupId>io.quarkus</groupId>
          <artifactId>quarkus-resteasy-client-oidc-filter</artifactId>
        </dependency>
        <dependency>
          <groupId>io.quarkus</groupId>
          <artifactId>quarkus-resteasy-multipart</artifactId>
        </dependency>
      </dependencies>
    </profile>

Additionally, you need to add to add a dependency with the test scope:

    <dependency>
      <groupId>io.quarkus</groupId>
      <artifactId>quarkus-rest-client-jackson</artifactId>
      <scope>test</scope>
    </dependency>

[mcruzdev]

The CI error is relate (see), probably now the error is on test side.

[matheusandre1]

crazy lol

[matheusandre1]

quarkus-rest-client-jackson needs to be a normal module dependency, not a test-scoped one.

[mcruzdev]

Thanks for this contribution @matheusandre1