Skip to content

Conversation

gordonwoodhull
Copy link
Contributor

This fixes the Giscus light/dark issue by continuing down the road of #11047 and #12567 and getting it to work.

Most of the issues were caused by the new ambiguity between the author preference and the user preference.

I hope we don't have to merge this, but this is fully tested across author preference, user preference, and respect-user-color-scheme.

I'm going to try a simpler fix against #12570, which instead removes #11047 (the mutation observer and dynamic loading of the giscus script).

Submitting this as draft in case the simpler solution doesn't succeed.

@posit-snyk-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

posit-snyk-bot commented Apr 23, 2025

🎉 Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

security/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

license/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

@gordonwoodhull gordonwoodhull deleted the bugfix/giscus-light-dark-author-pref-base-alt-semantics branch April 24, 2025 15:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants