Better error exposure around JobHandle (aka QFuture<std::expected<>>) #926
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In essence, this PR makes
JobHandle
to produce aQFuture<std::expected<...>>
thing if you want to propagate errors in the same package as responses. When working directly withJobHandle
you can simply use 2-argthen()
; but if you want to take aQFuture
out ofJobHandle
and only carry the result after letting the job self-destruct, well, here's a way.It is still a bit experimental but after trying it on a couple of methods from
Connection
I think it makes sense. In Quaternion, I have a blanket error handling, the legacy of very early times - whicheverrequestFailed()
occurred, a single handler processes it. Although all new requests automatically get this blanket error handling, I can't specialise it for specific requests. This PR allows me to add error reporting and handling on the spot without having to stick withJobHandle
s. And actually, one such case even pre-dates this PR:Room::upgrade()
already returnsQFuture<std::expected<...>>
and using that is very organic I believe.Opinions welcome.