Improve the construction of QobjEvo

[ytdHuang]

Checklist

Thank you for contributing to QuantumToolbox.jl! Please make sure you have finished the following tasks before opening the PR.

• Please read Contributing to QuantumToolbox.jl.
• Any code changes were done in a way that does not break public API.
• Appropriate tests were added and tested locally by running: make test.
• Any code changes should be julia formatted by running: make format.
• All documents (in docs/ folder) related to code changes were updated and able to build locally by running: make docs.
• (If necessary) the CHANGELOG.md should be updated (regarding to the code changes) and built by running: make changelog.

Request for a review after you have completed all the tasks. If you have not finished them all, you can also open a Draft Pull Request to let the others know this on-going work.

Description

Summary of this PR:

• add new methods to generate QobjEvo with input type Tuple{QuantumObject,Function}.
• add argument checks for each coefficient Function by using Base.methods.

Related issues or PRs

close #338

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.30%. Comparing base (0f2c4a1) to head (d5834af).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #339      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.28%   93.30%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          38       38              
  Lines        2637     2645       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits         2460     2468       +8     
  Misses        177      177              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[ytdHuang]

Hmm...

the code-quality test succeed in my local laptop...

Not sure why it fails in CI pipeline

[albertomercurio]

I think it's good. Do we have tests for type instabilities? What happens if we run

@inferred QobjEvo((op, coef))

and all the other methods?

[ytdHuang]

I think it's good. Do we have tests for type instabilities? What happens if we run

@inferred QobjEvo((op, coef))

and all the other methods?

Ok, added~

[albertomercurio]

Are you using the latest versions in your local runtests for the code quality?

[ytdHuang]

Are you using the latest versions in your local runtests for the code quality?

Yes, JET v0.9.12 on MacOS m-series chip

Also,JET v0.9.12 on MacOS intel-chip also passes

[albertomercurio]

I have the same error locally

[albertomercurio]

I think the error comes from the new method definition of QuantumObjectEvolution and the Julia version v1.11.2. Either removing the error, or running with Julia v1.10.7 doesn't show the error. But still we need to know why.

[ytdHuang]

@albertomercurio

Ok, fixed