-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 340
Make accept_snapshot() work on filenames containing a dot (#1669) #2029
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
18efb9e
Make accept_snapshot() work on filenames containing a dot (#1669)
mcol 8244bd7
Merged origin/main into mcol-issue_1669
hadley 5cf6fa4
Update news bullet
hadley c524d33
Merged origin/main into mcol-issue_1669
hadley 349561e
Move bullet to top
hadley 2aa0829
Add partial support for any snapshot extension.
mcol File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think your fix assumes that snapshots can only have file names ending in
.mdor.txt, but in fact they can have any extension because the user supplies the extension inexpect_snapshot_file().But overall I find this code (i.e. the code that existed before your PR) very hard to understand: I don't understand what it's try is trying to achieve, or how the logic flows. So that might imply it's time to take a step back and rewrite this code to make it more clear what the varies inputs are.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've pushed a partial fix for the hardcoded extensions, although it may not work if there are multiple snapshot extensions being used simultaneously (but also, there's no pre-existing test for that case, independently of dots in the filenames).
Having said that, I agree that this code is quite hacky as it is. Are you planning to do it or should I have a go?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd really appreciate it if you wanted to have a go 😄