Skip to content

Conversation

@mergify
Copy link

@mergify mergify bot commented May 8, 2025

Proposed Changes

This is useful for a load balancer, for example, to be able to avoid sending new connections to a node which is running and has listeners bound to TCP ports but is being drained for maintenance.

This PR covers the first part of #13782: adding a new health-check GET /api/health/checks/is-in-service.

Types of Changes

What types of changes does your code introduce to this project?
Put an x in the boxes that apply

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes issue #NNNN)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause an observable behavior change in existing systems)
  • Documentation improvements (corrections, new content, etc)
  • Cosmetic change (whitespace, formatting, etc)
  • Build system and/or CI

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply.
You can also fill these out after creating the PR.
If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask on the mailing list.
We're here to help!
This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.

This is useful for a load balancer, for example, to be able to avoid
sending new connections to a node which is running and has listeners
bound to TCP ports but is being drained for maintenance.

(cherry picked from commit 07fe630)
@the-mikedavis the-mikedavis merged commit 6b71f77 into v4.1.x May 8, 2025
271 checks passed
@the-mikedavis the-mikedavis deleted the mergify/bp/v4.1.x/pr-13872 branch May 8, 2025 18:34
@michaelklishin michaelklishin added this to the 4.1.1 milestone May 8, 2025
@michaelklishin
Copy link
Collaborator

@the-mikedavis please don't forget to set the milestone when merging :)

the-mikedavis added a commit to rabbitmq/rabbitmq-website that referenced this pull request May 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants