-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
Automated Resyntax fixes #703
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1caf46b
Fix 1 occurrence of `tidy-require`
resyntax-ci[bot] 472c5ff
Fix 2 occurrences of `if-else-false-to-and`
resyntax-ci[bot] d38a781
Fix 2 occurrences of `define-lambda-to-define`
resyntax-ci[bot] 9c04399
Fix 1 occurrence of `cond-let-to-cond-define`
resyntax-ci[bot] f0d1d35
Fix 8 occurrences of `let-to-define`
resyntax-ci[bot] c0e5f5c
Fix 2 occurrences of `hash-ref-with-constant-lambda-to-hash-ref-witho…
resyntax-ci[bot] c530e56
Fix 1 occurrence of `inverted-when`
resyntax-ci[bot] 39963d6
Fix 1 occurrence of `cond-let-to-cond-define`
resyntax-ci[bot] 5836598
Fix 1 occurrence of `let-to-define`
resyntax-ci[bot] 0a9d027
Fix 1 occurrence of `inverted-when`
resyntax-ci[bot] File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sorawee this is an unfortunate newline, I'd say. Better if
let/ecalways put the identifier on the same line and then to inside thelet/ecisntead of to the start of the identifier. Is that possible?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree. Currently the
let/eccall is treated like a function application. It would be easy to instruct that it's a special form, which needs to be formatted differently.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed by sorawee/fmt#83. @jackfirth is there a way to re-run this PR with the latest fmt?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like #709 took care of it.