Automated Resyntax fixes #739
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This `for-each` operation can be replaced with a `for` loop.
The `instantiate` form is for mixing positional and by-name constructor arguments. When no positional arguments are needed, use `new` instead.
Internal definitions are recommended instead of `let` expressions, to reduce nesting.
This expression is equivalent to calling the `negative?` predicate.
Member
|
I'm not sold on the use of |
Collaborator
|
I haven't been too pleased with those suggestions either. I've disabled them. Up to you whether you want to merge this as-is, close it and let Resyntax try again now that those suggestions are gone, or edit this PR to remove/revert those specific fixes and then merge it. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resyntax fixed 20 issues in 2 files.
instantiate-to-newlet-to-definezero-comparison-to-negative?for-each-to-for