Skip to content

Conversation

@resyntax-ci
Copy link
Contributor

@resyntax-ci resyntax-ci bot commented Jan 22, 2025

Resyntax fixed 20 issues in 6 files.

  • Fixed 6 occurrences of let-to-define
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of unless-expression-in-for-loop-to-unless-keyword
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of hash-map-to-hash-keys
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of when-expression-in-for-loop-to-when-keyword
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of single-clause-match-to-match-define
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of if-let-to-cond
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of define-let-to-double-define
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of inline-unnecessary-define
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of or-hash-ref-set!-to-hash-ref!
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of inline-unnecessary-begin
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of always-throwing-if-to-when
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of map-to-for

resyntax-ci bot added 12 commits January 22, 2025 00:15
This `map` operation can be replaced with a `for/list` loop.
Internal definitions are recommended instead of `let` expressions, to reduce nesting.
This `let` expression can be pulled up into a `define` expression.
Use the `#:unless` keyword instead of `unless` to reduce loop body indentation.
Use the `#:when` keyword instead of `when` to reduce loop body indentation.
This variable is returned immediately and can be inlined.
This `hash-map` expression is equivalent to the `hash-keys` function.
This `begin` form can be flattened into the surrounding definition context.
`cond` with internal definitions is preferred over `if` with `let`, to reduce nesting
This expression can be replaced with a simpler, equivalent `hash-ref!` expression.
This `match` expression can be simplified using `match-define`.
Using `when` and `unless` is simpler than a conditional with an always-throwing branch.
@mflatt
Copy link
Member

mflatt commented Jun 26, 2025

Conflicts with newer merges (at least with a simple merge).

@mflatt mflatt closed this Jun 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants